These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26559952)

  • 1. Why does offspring size affect performance? Integrating metabolic scaling with life-history theory.
    Pettersen AK; White CR; Marshall DJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Nov; 282(1819):. PubMed ID: 26559952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transgenerational plasticity in the sea: context-dependent maternal effects across the life history.
    Marshall DJ
    Ecology; 2008 Feb; 89(2):418-27. PubMed ID: 18409431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Offspring size plasticity in response to intraspecific competition: an adaptive maternal effect across life-history stages.
    Allen RM; Buckley YM; Marshall DJ
    Am Nat; 2008 Feb; 171(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 18197775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Offspring size in a resident species affects community assembly.
    Davis K; Marshall DJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Mar; 83(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 26046291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between offspring size and performance in the sea.
    Marshall DJ; Keough MJ
    Am Nat; 2008 Feb; 171(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 18197774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why do larger mothers produce larger offspring? A test of classic theory.
    Cameron H; Monro K; Malerba M; Munch S; Marshall D
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3452-3459. PubMed ID: 27912014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A manipulative test of competing theories for metabolic scaling.
    White CR; Kearney MR; Matthews PG; Kooijman SA; Marshall DJ
    Am Nat; 2011 Dec; 178(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22089869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Squamate hatchling size and the evolutionary causes of negative offspring size allometry.
    Meiri S; Feldman A; Kratochvíl L
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Feb; 28(2):438-46. PubMed ID: 25557433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eggs as energy: revisiting the scaling of egg size and energetic content among echinoderms.
    Moran AL; McAlister JS; Whitehill EA
    Biol Bull; 2013 Aug; 224(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 23995742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does interspecific competition affect offspring provisioning?
    Marshall DJ; Keough MJ
    Ecology; 2009 Feb; 90(2):487-95. PubMed ID: 19323232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evolutionary ecology of offspring size in marine invertebrates.
    Marshall DJ; Keough MJ
    Adv Mar Biol; 2007; 53():1-60. PubMed ID: 17936135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The positive correlation between maternal size and offspring size: fitting pieces of a life-history puzzle.
    Rollinson N; Rowe L
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 Nov; 91(4):1134-1148. PubMed ID: 26289842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Form and metabolic scaling in colonial animals.
    Hartikainen H; Humphries S; Okamura B
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Mar; 217(Pt 5):779-86. PubMed ID: 24265433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temperature-induced maternal effects and environmental predictability.
    Burgess SC; Marshall DJ
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Jul; 214(Pt 14):2329-36. PubMed ID: 21697424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Larval size and age affect colonization in a marine invertebrate.
    Marshall DJ; Steinberg PD
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Nov; 217(Pt 22):3981-7. PubMed ID: 25267847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interspecific relationships between egg size and the level of parental investment per offspring in echinoderms.
    McEdward LR; Morgan KH
    Biol Bull; 2001 Feb; 200(1):33-50. PubMed ID: 11249210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linking life-history theory and metabolic theory explains the offspring size-temperature relationship.
    Pettersen AK; White CR; Bryson-Richardson RJ; Marshall DJ
    Ecol Lett; 2019 Mar; 22(3):518-526. PubMed ID: 30618178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bigger is not always better: offspring size does not predict growth or survival for seven ascidian species.
    Jacobs MW; Sherrard KM
    Ecology; 2010 Dec; 91(12):3598-608. PubMed ID: 21302831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can competitive asymmetries maintain offspring size variation? A manipulative field test.
    Cameron H; Marshall DJ
    Evolution; 2019 Aug; 73(8):1663-1671. PubMed ID: 31313289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-limited environments affect the evolution of egg-body size allometry.
    Eckerström-Liedholm S; Sowersby W; Gonzalez-Voyer A; Rogell B
    Evolution; 2017 Jul; 71(7):1900-1910. PubMed ID: 28590008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.