These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26560543)

  • 1. Comparison of Six Automated Treponema-Specific Antibody Assays.
    Park BG; Yoon JG; Rim JH; Lee A; Kim HS
    J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Jan; 54(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 26560543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a colloidal gold immunochromatography assay in the detection of Treponema pallidum specific IgM antibody in syphilis serofast reaction patients: a serologic marker for the relapse and infection of syphilis.
    Lin LR; Tong ML; Fu ZG; Dan B; Zheng WH; Zhang CG; Yang TC; Zhang ZY
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 May; 70(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21388769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Lumipulse G TP-N Chemiluminescent Immunoassay as a Syphilis Screening Test.
    Ortiz DA; Loeffelholz MJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Nov; 55(11):3236-3241. PubMed ID: 28878003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of Treponemal Immunoassay Signal Strength Values with Reactivity of Confirmatory Treponemal Testing.
    Fakile YF; Jost H; Hoover KW; Gustafson KJ; Novak-Weekley SM; Schapiro JM; Tran A; Chow JM; Park IU
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 56(1):. PubMed ID: 29046410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of nine different syphilis serological tests in comparison with the FTA-abs test.
    Sonmez C; Sezen F; Kilic S
    J Immunol Methods; 2019 Jan; 464():9-14. PubMed ID: 30138611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a fully automated treponemal test and comparison with conventional VDRL and FTA-ABS tests.
    Park Y; Park Y; Joo SY; Park MH; Kim HS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Nov; 136(5):705-10. PubMed ID: 22031308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of automated architect syphilis TP as a diagnostic laboratory screening test for syphilis].
    Kim J; Kim WH; Cho C; Kim J; Kim GY; Nam MH; Kim JS; Bae SY; Cho Y
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Dec; 28(6):475-82. PubMed ID: 19127113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of Treponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.
    Park IU; Fakile YF; Chow JM; Gustafson KJ; Jost H; Schapiro JM; Novak-Weekley S; Tran A; Nomura JH; Chen V; Beheshti M; Tsai T; Hoover K; Bolan G
    Clin Infect Dis; 2019 Mar; 68(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29986091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of new algorithm using TPLA as an initial syphilis screening test.
    Murai R; Yamada K; Yonezawa H; Yanagihara N; Takahashi S
    J Infect Chemother; 2019 Jan; 25(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 30054230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Elecsys Syphilis Assay for Routine and Blood Screening and Detection of Early Infection.
    Kremastinou J; Polymerou V; Lavranos D; Aranda Arrufat A; Harwood J; Martínez Lorenzo MJ; Ng KP; Queiros L; Vereb I; Cusini M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 54(9):2330-6. PubMed ID: 27358468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.
    Park IU; Tran A; Pereira L; Fakile Y
    Clin Infect Dis; 2020 Jun; 71(Suppl 1):S13-S20. PubMed ID: 32578866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytical evaluation of nine serological assays for diagnosis of syphilis.
    Malm K; Andersson S; Fredlund H; Norrgren H; Biague A; Månsson F; Ballard R; Unemo M
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):2369-76. PubMed ID: 26370737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of fully automated syphilis tests with conventional VDRL and FTA-ABS tests.
    Choi SJ; Park Y; Lee EY; Kim S; Kim HS
    Clin Biochem; 2013 Jun; 46(9):834-7. PubMed ID: 23454393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the anti-TP antibody latex agglutination immunoassay in routine testing and a clinical viewpoint].
    Fujimori C; Yukimasa N; Miura K; Mochizuki S; Yasuhara T; Takagi Y; Gomi K
    Rinsho Byori; 2009 Mar; 57(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 19363990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further evaluation of the characteristics of Treponema pallidum-specific IgM antibody in syphilis serofast reaction patients.
    Lin LR; Zheng WH; Tong ML; Fu ZG; Liu GL; Fu JG; Zhang DW; Yang TC; Liu LL
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Nov; 71(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 21899981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 syphilis system as a first-line method of reverse-sequence screening for syphilis diagnosis.
    Marangoni A; Nardini P; Foschi C; Moroni A; D'Antuono A; Bacchi Reggiani L; Cevenini R
    Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):1084-8. PubMed ID: 23697575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a colloidal gold-immunochromatography assay to detect immunoglobulin G antibodies to Treponema pallidum with TPN17 and TPN47.
    Lin LR; Fu ZG; Dan B; Jing GJ; Tong ML; Chen DT; Yu Y; Zhang CG; Yang TC; Zhang ZY
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Nov; 68(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 20846810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytical Comparison of the Architect Syphilis TP and Liaison Treponema Automated Chemiluminescent Immunoassays and Their Performance in a Reverse Syphilis Screening Algorithm.
    Sanfilippo AM; Freeman K; Schmitz JL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Aug; 56(8):. PubMed ID: 29769276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the automated ADVIA centaur® XP syphilis assay for serological testing.
    Saw S; Zhao H; Tan P; Saw B; Sethi S
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2017 May; 88(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 28256292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for syphilis with the treponemal immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and implications for clinical management.
    Park IU; Chow JM; Bolan G; Stanley M; Shieh J; Schapiro JM
    J Infect Dis; 2011 Nov; 204(9):1297-304. PubMed ID: 21930610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.