These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26560704)

  • 21. Opportunities and challenges for the inclusion of patient preferences in the medical product life cycle: a systematic review.
    Janssens R; Huys I; van Overbeeke E; Whichello C; Harding S; Kübler J; Juhaeri J; Ciaglia A; Simoens S; Stevens H; Smith M; Levitan B; Cleemput I; de Bekker-Grob E; Veldwijk J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Oct; 19(1):189. PubMed ID: 31585538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of the underlying assumptions of the quality-adjusted life-years outcome: results from the ECHOUTCOME European project.
    Beresniak A; Medina-Lara A; Auray JP; De Wever A; Praet JC; Tarricone R; Torbica A; Dupont D; Lamure M; Duru G
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Jan; 33(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 25230587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient centered decision making: use of conjoint analysis to determine risk-benefit trade-offs for preference sensitive treatment choices.
    Wilson L; Loucks A; Bui C; Gipson G; Zhong L; Schwartzburg A; Crabtree E; Goodin D; Waubant E; McCulloch C
    J Neurol Sci; 2014 Sep; 344(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 25037284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Informing Reimbursement Decisions Using Cost-Effectiveness Modelling: A Guide to the Process of Generating Elicited Priors to Capture Model Uncertainties.
    Bojke L; Grigore B; Jankovic D; Peters J; Soares M; Stein K
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):867-877. PubMed ID: 28616775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. PATIENT-CENTERED DECISION MAKING: LESSONS FROM MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR QUANTIFYING PATIENT PREFERENCES.
    Marsh K; Caro JJ; Zaiser E; Heywood J; Hamed A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 29277175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conjoint analysis of preferences for cardiac risk assessment in primary care.
    Sassi F; McDaid D; Ricciardi W
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 15921061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trends in the measurement of health utilities in published cost-utility analyses.
    Brauer CA; Rosen AB; Greenberg D; Neumann PJ
    Value Health; 2006; 9(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 16903990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. From decision to shared-decision: Introducing patients' preferences into clinical decision analysis.
    Sacchi L; Rubrichi S; Rognoni C; Panzarasa S; Parimbelli E; Mazzanti A; Napolitano C; Priori SG; Quaglini S
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Sep; 65(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 25455562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Design, Conduct, and Use of Patient Preference Studies in the Medical Product Life Cycle: A Multi-Method Study.
    van Overbeeke E; Janssens R; Whichello C; Schölin Bywall K; Sharpe J; Nikolenko N; Phillips BS; Guiddi P; Pravettoni G; Vergani L; Marton G; Cleemput I; Simoens S; Kübler J; Juhaeri J; Levitan B; de Bekker-Grob EW; Veldwijk J; Huys I
    Front Pharmacol; 2019; 10():1395. PubMed ID: 31849657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient and general public preferences for health states: A call to reconsider current guidelines.
    Versteegh MM; Brouwer WBF
    Soc Sci Med; 2016 Sep; 165():66-74. PubMed ID: 27497260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Involving patients, the insured and the general public in healthcare decision making].
    Mühlbacher AC; Juhnke C
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2016; 110-111():36-44. PubMed ID: 26875034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Health technology assessment.
    Hailey D
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incorporating Quantitative Patient Preference Data into Healthcare Decision Making Processes: Is HTA Falling Behind?
    Mott DJ
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):249-252. PubMed ID: 29500706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Health technology assessment and primary data collection for reducing uncertainty in decision making.
    Goeree R; Levin L; Chandra K; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Tarride JE; Burke N; Bischof M; Xie F; O'Reilly D
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):332-42. PubMed ID: 19394574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Systematic searching and selection of health state utility values from the literature.
    Papaioannou D; Brazier J; Paisley S
    Value Health; 2013 Jun; 16(4):686-95. PubMed ID: 23796303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. General Population vs. Patient Preferences in Anticoagulant Therapy: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Najafzadeh M; Schneeweiss S; Choudhry NK; Avorn J; Gagne JJ
    Patient; 2019 Apr; 12(2):235-246. PubMed ID: 30242575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health technology assessment.
    Papatheofanis FJ
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 10967621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preference-based antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: implications for clinical decision making.
    Man-Son-Hing M; Gage BF; Montgomery AA; Howitt A; Thomson R; Devereaux PJ; Protheroe J; Fahey T; Armstrong D; Laupacis A
    Med Decis Making; 2005; 25(5):548-59. PubMed ID: 16160210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. International Regulations and Recommendations for Utility Data for Health Technology Assessment.
    Rowen D; Azzabi Zouraq I; Chevrou-Severac H; van Hout B
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Dec; 35(Suppl 1):11-19. PubMed ID: 29052162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ranking the Criteria Used in the Appraisal of Drugs for Reimbursement: A Stated Preferences Elicitation With Health Technology Assessment Stakeholders Across Jurisdictional Contexts.
    Wranik WD; Jakubczyk M; Drachal K
    Value Health; 2020 Apr; 23(4):471-480. PubMed ID: 32327164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.