These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26560924)

  • 1. Color-weak compensation using local affine isometry based on discrimination threshold matching.
    Mochizuki R; Kojima T; Lenz R; Chao J
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Nov; 32(11):2093-103. PubMed ID: 26560924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling, Measuring, and Compensating Color Weak Vision.
    Oshima S; Mochizuki R; Lenz R; Chao J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jun; 25(6):2587-2600. PubMed ID: 27046849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geodesic chromaticity diagram based on variances of color matching by 14 normal observers.
    Macadam DL
    Appl Opt; 1971 Jan; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20094380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Associating color appearance with the cone chromaticity space.
    Cao D; Pokorny J; Smith VC
    Vision Res; 2005 Jul; 45(15):1929-34. PubMed ID: 15820511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of threshold color differences using printed samples.
    Huang M; Liu H; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Jun; 29(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 22673417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of chromatic image statistics on illumination induced color differences.
    Lucassen MP; Gevers T; Gijsenij A; Dekker N
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Sep; 30(9):1871-84. PubMed ID: 24323269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chromaticity-discrimination thresholds with aperture and object colors: experimental results and predictions of some recent color-difference formulas.
    Melgosa M; Perez MM; Hita E
    Appl Opt; 1996 Jan; 35(1):176-87. PubMed ID: 21068996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From CIE 2006 physiological model to improved age-dependent and average colorimetric observers.
    Sarkar A; Autrusseau F; Viénot F; Le Callet P; Blondé L
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Oct; 28(10):2033-48. PubMed ID: 21979508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of high-color-discrimination capability spectra on color-deficient vision.
    Perales E; Linhares JM; Masuda O; Martínez-Verdú FM; Nascimento SM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Sep; 30(9):1780-6. PubMed ID: 24323259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth.
    Alghazali N; Burnside G; Moallem M; Smith P; Preston A; Jarad FD
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e10-7. PubMed ID: 22561647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Searching for variegated elements.
    Monnier P; Gustafson J
    J Vis; 2011 Jan; 11(1):12. PubMed ID: 21224343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the starting point chromaticity on memory color matching accuracy.
    Ma S; Hanselaer P; Teunissen K; Smet KAG
    Opt Express; 2019 Nov; 27(24):35308-35324. PubMed ID: 31878702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chromatic discrimination of natural objects.
    Hansen T; Giesel M; Gegenfurtner KR
    J Vis; 2008 Jan; 8(1):2.1-19. PubMed ID: 18318605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Color categorization and the structure of perceptive color].
    Endrikhovskiĭ SN
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2000; 50(5):833-42. PubMed ID: 11084999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.
    Liu H; Huang M; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Apr; 30(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 23595320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational color prediction versus least-dissimilar matching.
    Roshan E; Funt B
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Apr; 35(4):B292-B298. PubMed ID: 29603955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search in natural scenes explained by local color properties.
    Amano K; Foster DH; Mould MS; Oakley JP
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Feb; 29(2):A194-9. PubMed ID: 22330379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurements of the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness.
    Ripamonti C; Bloj M; Hauck R; Kiran M; Greenwald S; Maloney SI; Brainard DH
    J Vis; 2004 Sep; 4(9):747-63. PubMed ID: 15493968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental study of the individual differences in chromatic perception through blue-yellow metameric matches of a white-light continuum.
    Suero MI; Naranjo FL; Pardo PJ; Pérez AL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 20883350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.