These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Authors seldom report the most patient-important outcomes and absolute effect measures in systematic review abstracts. Agarwal A; Johnston BC; Vernooij RW; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Akl EA; Sun X; Briel M; Busse JW; Ebrahim S; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramirez-Morera A; Selva A; Solà I; Sanabrai AJ; Tikkinen KA; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Zazueta OE; Zhou Q; Schunemann HJ; Guyatt GH; Alonso-Coello P J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():3-12. PubMed ID: 27555080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocol. Alonso-Coello P; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Akl EA; Sun X; Johnston BC; Briel M; Busse JW; Glujovsky D; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramirez-Morera A; Solà I; Tikkinen KA; Ebrahim S; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Selva A; Sanabria AJ; Zazueta OE; Vernooij RW; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():113. PubMed ID: 24330779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. Moher D; Tetzlaff J; Tricco AC; Sampson M; Altman DG PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e78. PubMed ID: 17388659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews? Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. Page MJ; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Tetzlaff J; Sampson M; Tricco AC; Catalá-López F; Li L; Reid EK; Sarkis-Onofre R; Moher D PLoS Med; 2016 May; 13(5):e1002028. PubMed ID: 27218655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic reviews in dentistry: Current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. Bassani R; Pereira GKR; Page MJ; Tricco AC; Moher D; Sarkis-Onofre R J Dent; 2019 Mar; 82():71-84. PubMed ID: 30716451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials. Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survey of the reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in rehabilitation. Gianola S; Gasparini M; Agostini M; Castellini G; Corbetta D; Gozzer P; Li LC; Sirtori V; Taricco M; Tetzlaff JM; Turolla A; Moher D; Moja L Phys Ther; 2013 Nov; 93(11):1456-66. PubMed ID: 23744458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of epidemiological and reporting characteristics of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) systematic reviews (SRs). Turner L; Galipeau J; Garritty C; Manheimer E; Wieland LS; Yazdi F; Moher D PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53536. PubMed ID: 23341949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019. Hoffmann F; Allers K; Rombey T; Helbach J; Hoffmann A; Mathes T; Pieper D J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():1-11. PubMed ID: 34091022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals. Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions. Page MJ; Altman DG; Shamseer L; McKenzie JE; Ahmadzai N; Wolfe D; Yazdi F; Catalá-López F; Tricco AC; Moher D J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 94():8-18. PubMed ID: 29113936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heterogeneity of studies in anesthesiology systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological review and proposal for evidence mapping. Umberham B; Hedin R; Detweiler B; Kollmorgen L; Hicks C; Vassar M Br J Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 119(5):874-884. PubMed ID: 29029012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]