BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26561031)

  • 1. Midterm functional results of taTME with neuromapping for low rectal cancer.
    Kneist W; Wachter N; Paschold M; Kauff DW; Rink AD; Lang H
    Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Jan; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 26561031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision.
    Pontallier A; Denost Q; Van Geluwe B; Adam JP; Celerier B; Rullier E
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4924-4933. PubMed ID: 26944728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative study of functional prognosis of transanal total mesorectal excision and conventional total mesorectal excision based on propensity score matching].
    Zhu LY; Zhao SD; Shen ZL; Ye YJ; Yin MJ; Yang XD; Xie QW; Jiang KW; Liang B; Wang S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 58(8):619-625. PubMed ID: 32727194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome.
    Koedam TW; van Ramshorst GH; Deijen CL; Elfrink AK; Meijerink WJ; Bonjer HJ; Sietses C; Tuynman JB
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Jan; 21(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 28044239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective study of health related quality of life, bowel and sexual function after TaTME and conventional laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer.
    Li Y; Bai X; Niu B; Zhou J; Qiu H; Xiao Y; Lin G
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Apr; 25(4):449-459. PubMed ID: 33646454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of postoperative bowel function between patients undergoing transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision].
    Dou R; Sun W; Luo S; Hou Y; Zhang C; Kang L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 22(3):246-254. PubMed ID: 30919377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of Life After Surgery for Rectal Cancer: a Comparison of Functional Outcomes After Transanal and Laparoscopic Approaches.
    Bjoern MX; Nielsen S; Perdawood SK
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Aug; 23(8):1623-1630. PubMed ID: 30603861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic surgery contributes to the preservation of bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision: comparisons with transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery.
    Miura T; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Suto A; Kubota S; Ichisawa A; Kuwata D; Yamada T; Tamba H; Matsumoto S; Hakamada K
    BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):147. PubMed ID: 35449005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in sexual, anorectal, and urinary function: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.
    Grass JK; Persiani R; Tirelli F; Chen CC; Caricato M; Pecorino A; Lang IJ; Kemper M; Izbicki JR; Melling N; Perez D
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Dec; 36(12):2749-2761. PubMed ID: 34537862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision.
    Veltcamp Helbach M; Koedam TWA; Knol JJ; Velthuis S; Bonjer HJ; Tuynman JB; Sietses C
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jan; 33(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 29967994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter investigation of bowel evacuation function after transanal total mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer.
    Shen Z; Yu G; Ren M; Ding C; Zhang H; Li S; Xu Q; Wang Q; Chen Y; Xie Z; Zhang Q; Ye K; Xu X; Xiang J; Zhang H; Yan S; Lu C; Yao H; Zhang H; Kang L; Jiang K; Wang S; Ye Y
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2021 Apr; 36(4):725-734. PubMed ID: 33392665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study.
    Rubinkiewicz M; Zarzycki P; Czerwińska A; Wysocki M; Gajewska N; Torbicz G; Budzyński A; Pędziwiatr M
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 16(1):218. PubMed ID: 30404633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME): a random forest analysis to predict patients' outcomes.
    Tirelli F; Lorenzon L; Biondi A; Neri I; Santoro G; Persiani R
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Nov; 27(11):1037-1046. PubMed ID: 36871281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Rasulov AO; Mamedli ZZ; Gordeyev SS; Kozlov NA; Dzhumabaev HE
    Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Apr; 20(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 26794213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality of life and functional outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-results from the implementation period in Denmark.
    Bjoern MX; Clausen FB; Seiersen M; Bulut O; Bech-Knudsen F; Jansen JE; Gögenur I; Klein MF
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Sep; 37(9):1997-2011. PubMed ID: 35960389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision.
    Rubinkiewicz M; Zarzycki P; Witowski J; Pisarska M; Gajewska N; Torbicz G; Nowakowski M; Major P; Budzyński A; Pędziwiatr M
    BMC Surg; 2019 Jul; 19(1):79. PubMed ID: 31277628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. TaTME: analysis of the evacuatory outcomes and EUS anal sphincter.
    Leão P; Santos C; Goulart A; Caetano AC; Sousa M; Hogemann G; Parvaiz A; Figueiredo N
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2019 Dec; 28(6):332-337. PubMed ID: 30888248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark.
    Perdawood SK; Al Khefagie GA
    Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jan; 18(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 26603786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.
    Liang JT; Lai HS; Lee PH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17235719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiology-based quality assurance of nerve-sparing in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: Is it worth the effort?
    Kauff DW; Wachter N; Bettzieche R; Lang H; Kneist W
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4525-32. PubMed ID: 26895916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.