These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26561179)

  • 21. Light scattering from fused polycrystalline aluminum oxide surfaces.
    Hensler DH
    Appl Opt; 1972 Nov; 11(11):2522-8. PubMed ID: 20119367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wave optics approach to solar cell BRDF modeling with experimental results.
    Compean M; Small T; Hyde M; Marciniak M
    Opt Express; 2023 Jul; 31(16):26289-26300. PubMed ID: 37710492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preparing the generalized Harvey-Shack rough surface scattering method for use with the discrete ordinates method.
    Johansen VE
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Feb; 32(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 26366589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reflective properties of randomly rough surfaces under large incidence angles.
    Qiu J; Zhang WJ; Liu LH; Hsu PF; Liu LJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Jun; 31(6):1251-8. PubMed ID: 24977364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Unpolarized infrared emissivity with shadow from anisotropic rough sea surfaces with non-Gaussian statistics.
    Bourlier C
    Appl Opt; 2005 Jul; 44(20):4335-49. PubMed ID: 16045222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Empirical BRDF model for goniochromatic materials and soft proofing with reflective inks.
    Pranovich A; Frisvad JR; Valyukh S; Gooran S; Nystrom D
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2024 Apr; PP():. PubMed ID: 38640045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceived roughness of glossy objects: The influence of Fresnel effects and correlated image statistics.
    Faul F
    J Vis; 2021 Aug; 21(8):1. PubMed ID: 34338739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Energy conservation of the scattering from one-dimensional random rough surfaces in the high-frequency limit.
    Pinel N; Bourlier C; Saillard J
    Opt Lett; 2005 Aug; 30(15):2007-9. PubMed ID: 16092248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of slope approximations used in rough surface scattering.
    Welton PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL220-5. PubMed ID: 25698054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Geometrical considerations in analyzing isotropic or anisotropic surface reflections.
    Simonot L; Obein G
    Appl Opt; 2007 May; 46(14):2615-23. PubMed ID: 17446909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bidirectional reflectance distribution function of Spectralon white reflectance standard illuminated by incoherent unpolarized and plane-polarized light.
    Bhandari A; Hamre B; Frette Ø; Zhao L; Stamnes JJ; Kildemo M
    Appl Opt; 2011 Jun; 50(16):2431-42. PubMed ID: 21629324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling, measuring, and using BRDFs: significant French contributions.
    Simonot L; Obein G; Bringier B; Meneveaux D
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Nov; 36(11):C40-C50. PubMed ID: 31873692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of the material of rough surfaces and the incident light polarization on the validity of the surface impedance boundary condition and the geometric optics approximation for reflection and emission.
    Sassi I; Ghmari F; Sifaoui MS
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2009 Mar; 26(3):480-8. PubMed ID: 19252646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bi-frequency correlation properties of the scattered intensity from dielectric rough surfaces.
    Zhang G; Wu Z
    Opt Express; 2012 Jul; 20(14):14833-47. PubMed ID: 22772178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface characteristics modeling and performance evaluation of urban building materials using LiDAR data.
    Li X; Liang Y
    Appl Opt; 2015 May; 54(15):4750-9. PubMed ID: 26192511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of finite element and analytic models of acoustic scattering from rough poroelastic interfaces.
    Bonomo AL; Isakson MJ; Chotiros NP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):EL235-40. PubMed ID: 25920871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scattering from very rough layers under the geometric optics approximation: further investigation.
    Pinel N; Bourlier C
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Jun; 25(6):1293-306. PubMed ID: 18516140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A series approximation to the Kirchhoff integral for Gaussian and exponential roughness covariance functions.
    Olson DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jun; 149(6):4239. PubMed ID: 34241449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improved detection of rough defects for ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation inspections based on finite element modeling of elastic wave scattering.
    Pettit JR; Walker AE; Lowe MJ
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Oct; 62(10):1797-808. PubMed ID: 26470042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spectral scattering characteristics of space target in near-UV to visible bands.
    Bai L; Wu Z; Cao Y; Huang X
    Opt Express; 2014 Apr; 22(7):8515-24. PubMed ID: 24718223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.