354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26561881)
1. Reverberation negatively impacts musical sound quality for cochlear implant users.
Roy AT; Vigeant M; Munjal T; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S105-13. PubMed ID: 26561881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.
Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 23172009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.
Roy AT; Penninger RT; Pearl MS; Wuerfel W; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Buechner A; Limb CJ
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 26669557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.
Munjal T; Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S121-8. PubMed ID: 26561883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Compression on Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users.
Gilbert M; Jiradejvong P; Limb C
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1368-1375. PubMed ID: 30946137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Frequency Response Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.
Mo J; Jiam NT; Deroche MLD; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221120017. PubMed ID: 35983700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
Macherey O; Delpierre A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Vocal Boost Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.
Limb CJ; Mo J; Jiradejvong P; Jiam NT
Laryngoscope; 2023 Apr; 133(4):938-947. PubMed ID: 35906889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
Wright R; Uchanski RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dichotic Listening Can Improve Perceived Clarity of Music in Cochlear Implant Users.
Vannson N; Innes-Brown H; Marozeau J
Trends Hear; 2015 Aug; 19():. PubMed ID: 26316123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Music Engineering as a Novel Strategy for Enhancing Music Enjoyment in the Cochlear Implant Recipient.
Kohlberg GD; Mancuso DM; Chari DA; Lalwani AK
Behav Neurol; 2015; 2015():829680. PubMed ID: 26543322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Stupak N; Lavender A; Neukam J; Van de Heyning P; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound quality perception of cochlear implant recipients: low-frequency information and foreign-language effect.
Arslan NÖ; Akbulut AA; Köse B; Karaman-Demirel A; Derinsu U
Int J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 61(12):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 34894993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear implant users rely on tempo rather than on pitch information during perception of musical emotion.
Caldwell M; Rankin SK; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S114-20. PubMed ID: 26561882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Musical FAVORS: Reintroducing music to adult cochlear implant users.
Plant G
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S5-S12. PubMed ID: 26561887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicentre evaluation of music perception in adult users of Advanced Bionics cochlear implants.
Adams D; Ajimsha KM; Barberá MT; Gazibegovic D; Gisbert J; Gómez J; Raveh E; Rocca C; Romanet P; Seebens Y; Zarowski A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24074504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
