BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26561884)

  • 1. A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.
    Gfeller K; Guthe E; Driscoll V; Brown CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3(0 3):S22-31. PubMed ID: 26561884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Participatory design of a music aural rehabilitation programme.
    van Besouw RM; Oliver BR; Hodkinson SM; Polfreman R; Grasmeder ML
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S39-50. PubMed ID: 26561886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study.
    Hutter E; Argstatter H; Grapp M; Plinkert PK
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S13-21. PubMed ID: 26047068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Musical FAVORS: Reintroducing music to adult cochlear implant users.
    Plant G
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S5-S12. PubMed ID: 26561887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contribution of hearing aids to music perception by cochlear implant users.
    Peterson N; Bergeson TR
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S71-8. PubMed ID: 26561890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Randomized Controlled Crossover Study of the Impact of Online Music Training on Pitch and Timbre Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jiam NT; Deroche ML; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 20(3):247-262. PubMed ID: 30815761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Knutson JF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20085197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Musical Rehabilitation in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients With a Self-administered Software.
    Smith L; Bartel L; Joglekar S; Chen J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Sep; 38(8):e262-e267. PubMed ID: 28806336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Limb CJ; Roy AT
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():13-26. PubMed ID: 23665130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
    Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Music therapy in adults with cochlear implants : Effects on music perception and subjective sound quality].
    Hutter E; Grapp M; Argstatter H
    HNO; 2016 Dec; 64(12):880-890. PubMed ID: 27837214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
    Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Sep; 11(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 17709574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech performance and training effects in the cochlear implant elderly.
    Schumann A; Hast A; Hoppe U
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19 Suppl 1():45-48. PubMed ID: 25733367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Music mixing preferences of cochlear implant recipients: a pilot study.
    Buyens W; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 May; 53(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 24471410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.