These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26561972)

  • 1. Effects of Frequency Separation and Diotic/Dichotic Presentations on the Alternation Frequency Limits in Audition Derived from a Temporal Phase Discrimination Task.
    Kanaya S; Fujisaki W; Nishida S; Furukawa S; Yokosawa K
    Perception; 2015 Feb; 44(2):198-214. PubMed ID: 26561972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal frequency characteristics of synchrony-asynchrony discrimination of audio-visual signals.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):455-64. PubMed ID: 16032402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual learning in temporal discrimination: asymmetric cross-modal transfer from audition to vision.
    Bratzke D; Seifried T; Ulrich R
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 221(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22772383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When audition dominates vision: evidence from cross-modal statistical learning.
    Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 23047918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interregional alpha-band synchrony supports temporal cross-modal integration.
    van Driel J; Knapen T; van Es DM; Cohen MX
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():404-15. PubMed ID: 25042447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatiotemporal Relationships among Audiovisual Stimuli Modulate Auditory Facilitation of Visual Target Discrimination.
    Li Q; Yang H; Sun F; Wu J
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 26562250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiovisual temporal discrimination is less efficient with aging: an event-related potential study.
    Setti A; Finnigan S; Sobolewski R; McLaren L; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Kenny RA; Newell FN
    Neuroreport; 2011 Aug; 22(11):554-8. PubMed ID: 21691233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals.
    Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1185-96. PubMed ID: 24596081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.
    Corveleyn X; Lopez-Moliner J; Coello Y
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3379-92. PubMed ID: 26280314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.
    Rammsayer T; Pichelmann S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2364-2377. PubMed ID: 30362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities.
    Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for intramodal and cross-modal investigation of rhythms (temporal patterns) in audition, vision and touch.
    Mavlov L; Dascalov I
    Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg; 1981; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 7315380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representations of temporal information in short-term memory: Are they modality-specific?
    Bratzke D; Quinn KR; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():163-7. PubMed ID: 27518834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences.
    Repp BH; Penel A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Oct; 28(5):1085-99. PubMed ID: 12421057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 167(4):635-40. PubMed ID: 16175363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal sequence discrimination within and across senses: do we really hear what we see?
    Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3089-3098. PubMed ID: 31541284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of stimulus order on duration discrimination sensitivity are under attentional control.
    Dyjas O; Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):292-307. PubMed ID: 23895391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.