These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26562111)

  • 1. Increasing the Incidence and Influence of Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Practice.
    Chalmers I; Fox DM
    Am J Public Health; 2016 Jan; 106(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 26562111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence and Health Policy: Using and Regulating Systematic Reviews.
    Fox DM
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Jan; 107(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 27854522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The challenges of systematically reviewing public health interventions.
    Jackson N; Waters E;
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Sep; 26(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 15454602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based decision-making: practical issues in the appraisal of evidence to inform policy and practice.
    Carter BJ
    Aust Health Rev; 2010 Nov; 34(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 21108904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A mixed-methods approach to systematic reviews.
    Pearson A; White H; Bath-Hextall F; Salmond S; Apostolo J; Kirkpatrick P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 26196082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of qualitative research findings in evidence-based public health practice.
    Jack SM
    Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 16684207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organisation of evidence-based knowledge production: evidence hierarchies and evidence typologies.
    Hansen HF
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 Mar; 42(13 Suppl):11-7. PubMed ID: 24553850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and their implications for dental practice.
    Bader JD
    Tex Dent J; 2004 May; 121(5):380-7. PubMed ID: 15233044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studying systematic reviews.
    Del Mar C; Glasziou P
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):955-7. PubMed ID: 11711011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the pragmatic and explanatory study design on outcomes of systematic reviews of public health interventions: a case study on obesity prevention trials.
    Yoong SL; Wolfenden L; Clinton-McHarg T; Waters E; Pettman TL; Steele E; Wiggers J
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2014 Mar; 36(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 24574064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted.
    Bero L
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Jan; 107(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 27854519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of systematic reviews in the development of new provincial public health policies in Ontario.
    Dobbins M; Thomas H; O'Brien MA; Duggan M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 15609787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?
    Anderson R
    Health Econ; 2010 Mar; 19(3):350-64. PubMed ID: 19378354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological pluralism in the age of evidence-informed practice and policy.
    Shlonsky A; Mildon R
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 Mar; 42(13 Suppl):18-27. PubMed ID: 24553851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors of the innovation, organization, environment, and individual that predict the influence five systematic reviews had on public health decisions.
    Dobbins M; Cockerill R; Barnsley J; Ciliska D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(4):467-78. PubMed ID: 11758291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: scientific rationale and interpretation.
    Ferreira González I; Urrútia G; Alonso-Coello P
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):688-96. PubMed ID: 21719182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Update of strategies to translate evidence from cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews for use by various audiences.
    Rader T; Pardo Pardo J; Stacey D; Ghogomu E; Maxwell LJ; Welch VA; Singh JA; Buchbinder R; Légaré F; Santesso N; Toupin April K; O'Connor AM; Wells GA; Winzenberg TM; Johnston R; Tugwell P;
    J Rheumatol; 2014 Feb; 41(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 24293571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Evidence-Based Medicine on Qualitative Metasynthesis: Benefits to be Harvested and Warnings to be Given.
    Malterud K
    Qual Health Res; 2019 Jan; 29(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 30160202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Translating evidence from systematic reviews for policy makers.
    Nannini A; Houde SC
    J Gerontol Nurs; 2010 Jun; 36(6):22-6. PubMed ID: 20506938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.