These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26562341)

  • 1. Dispersion of TSP and PM(10) emissions from quarries in complex terrain.
    Tartakovsky D; Stern E; Broday DM
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 542(Pt A):946-54. PubMed ID: 26562341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of AERMOD and CALPUFF for predicting ambient concentrations of total suspended particulate matter (TSP) emissions from a quarry in complex terrain.
    Tartakovsky D; Broday DM; Stern E
    Environ Pollut; 2013 Aug; 179():138-45. PubMed ID: 23673194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of WRF Optimal Parameterization Scheme for Different Air Quality Models].
    Yang JC; Jiang XW; Bo X; Wang G; Feng Y
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2023 Jan; 44(1):104-117. PubMed ID: 36635800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of low wind modeling approaches for two tall-stack databases.
    Paine R; Samani O; Kaplan M; Knipping E; Kumar N
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Nov; 65(11):1341-53. PubMed ID: 26302223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AERCOARE: An overwater meteorological preprocessor for AERMOD.
    Wong H; Elleman R; Wolvovsky E; Richmond K; Paumier J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Nov; 66(11):1121-1140. PubMed ID: 27336680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parameterization and evaluation of the CALMET/CALPUFF model system in near-field and complex terrain - Terrain data, grid resolution and terrain adjustment method.
    Rzeszutek M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 689():31-46. PubMed ID: 31260897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of AERMOD and CALPUFF models for simulating SO2 concentrations in a gas refinery.
    Atabi F; Jafarigol F; Moattar F; Nouri J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Sep; 188(9):516. PubMed ID: 27521001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of AERMOD and WindTrax dispersion models in determining PM10 emission rates from a beef cattle feedlot.
    Bonifacio HF; Maghirang RG; Razote EB; Trabue SL; Prueger JH
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 May; 63(5):545-56. PubMed ID: 23786146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of two dispersion models (AERMOD and ISCST3) to input parameters for a rural ground-level area source.
    Faulkner WB; Shaw BW; Grosch T
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Oct; 58(10):1288-96. PubMed ID: 18939775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum turbulence assumptions and u* and L estimation for dispersion models during low-wind stable conditions.
    Hanna SR; Chowdhury B
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 24701689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
    Stanier CO; Lee SR;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dust emission and dispersion from mineral storage piles.
    Romeo A; Capelli L; Sironi S; Nano G; Rota R; Busini V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Oct; 24(28):22663-22672. PubMed ID: 28812200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of meteorological settings on air quality modeling system-a proposal for UN-SDG and regulatory studies in non-homogeneous regions in Brazil.
    Soares da Silva M; Pimentel LCG; Duda FP; Aragão L; Silva C; Dragaud ICDV; Vicentini PC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(1):1737-1760. PubMed ID: 35922592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling of particulate matter dispersion from a poultry facility using AERMOD.
    Hadlocon LS; Zhao LY; Bohrer G; Kenny W; Garrity SR; Wang J; Wyslouzil B; Upadhyay J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Feb; 65(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 25947056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the complex terrain algorithms incorporated into two commonly used local-scale air pollution dispersion models (ADMS and AERMOD) using a hybrid model.
    Carruthers DJ; Seaton MD; McHugh CA; Sheng X; Solazzo E; Vanvyve E
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Nov; 61(11):1227-35. PubMed ID: 22168106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of model performance between AERMOD and AUSTAL2000.
    Langner C; Klemm O
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Jun; 61(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 21751580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of error propagation in AERMOD lateral dispersion using Round Hill II and Uttenweiller experiments in reduced averaging times.
    Hoinaski L; Franco D; de Melo Lisboa H
    Environ Technol; 2017 Mar; 38(5):639-651. PubMed ID: 27348460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. AERMOD performance evaluation for three coal-fired electrical generating units in Southwest Indiana.
    Frost KD
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 24701687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the natural sources of particulate matter on the opencast mines air quality.
    Huertas JI; Huertas ME; Cervantes G; Díaz J
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Sep; 493():1047-55. PubMed ID: 25016110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.