153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26562429)
1. An Agent-Based Model of Private Woodland Owner Management Behavior Using Social Interactions, Information Flow, and Peer-To-Peer Networks.
Huff ES; Leahy JE; Hiebeler D; Weiskittel AR; Noblet CL
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142453. PubMed ID: 26562429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coupled ecological-social dynamics in a forested landscape: spatial interactions and information flow.
Satake A; Leslie HM; Iwasa Y; Levin SA
J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 17376488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Social and biophysical variation in regional timber harvest regimes.
Thompson JR; Canham CD; Morreale L; Kittredge DB; Butler B
Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):942-955. PubMed ID: 28054427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personal networks and private forestry in Minnesota.
Sagor ES; Becker DR
J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():145-54. PubMed ID: 24295725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting private forest landowner interest in ecosystem management: linking spatial and survey data.
Jacobson MG
Environ Manage; 2002 Oct; 30(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 12481923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond reaping the first harvest: management objectives for timber production in the Brazilian Amazon.
Zarin DJ; Schulze MD; Vidal E; Lentini M
Conserv Biol; 2007 Aug; 21(4):916-25. PubMed ID: 17650242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Management modes of different ownership forests and their ecological effects: a review].
Li NN; Li YH
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2011 Jun; 22(6):1623-31. PubMed ID: 21941768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping potential carbon and timber losses from hurricanes using a decision tree and ecosystem services driver model.
Delphin S; Escobedo FJ; Abd-Elrahman A; Cropper W
J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():599-607. PubMed ID: 24036093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.
Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in winter conditions impact forest management in north temperate forests.
Rittenhouse CD; Rissman AR
J Environ Manage; 2015 Feb; 149():157-67. PubMed ID: 25463581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protected forests in Europe approaches-harmonising the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making.
Parviainen J; Frank G
J Environ Manage; 2003 Jan; 67(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 12659801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proximal Association of Land Management Preferences: Evidence from Family Forest Owners.
Aguilar FX; Cai Z; Butler B
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169667. PubMed ID: 28060960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consider the source: the impact of media and authority in outreach to private forest and rangeland owners.
Ferranto S; Huntsinger L; Stewart W; Getz C; Nakamura G; Kelly M
J Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 97():131-40. PubMed ID: 22266415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A game theoretical model of deforestation in human-environment relationships.
Rodrigues A; Koeppl H; Ohtsuki H; Satake A
J Theor Biol; 2009 May; 258(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 19490882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Beliefs about the Potential Impacts of Exploiting Non-Timber Forest Products Predict Voluntary Participation in Monitoring.
Dantas Brites A; Morsello C
Environ Manage; 2017 Jun; 59(6):898-911. PubMed ID: 28324146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
