219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26562877)
1. SNARC Effect in Different Effectors.
Hesse PN; Fiehler K; Bremmer F
Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):180-95. PubMed ID: 26562877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
Hesse PN; Bremmer F
Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Key Distance to Clarify a Theory on the SNARC.
Schiller F; Eloka O; Franz VH
Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):196-221. PubMed ID: 26822868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes.
Hartmann M; Gashaj V; Stahnke A; Mast FW
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1401-14. PubMed ID: 24749934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. It does exist! A left-to-right spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect among native Hebrew speakers.
Zohar-Shai B; Tzelgov J; Karni A; Rubinsten O
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):719-728. PubMed ID: 28182477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numbers around Descartes: A preregistered study on the three-dimensional SNARC effect.
Aleotti S; Di Girolamo F; Massaccesi S; Priftis K
Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104111. PubMed ID: 31731115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.
Pressigout A; Charvillat A; Mersad K; Doré-Mazars K
Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 29633009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Number-space interactions in the human parietal cortex: Enlightening the SNARC effect with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
Cutini S; Scarpa F; Scatturin P; Dell'Acqua R; Zorzi M
Cereb Cortex; 2014 Feb; 24(2):444-51. PubMed ID: 23081883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The reciprocity of spatial-numerical associations of vocal response codes depends on stimulus mode.
Richter M; Wühr P
Mem Cognit; 2024 May; 52(4):944-964. PubMed ID: 38270776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cross-sectional developmental examination of the SNARC effect in a visually-guided grasping task.
Mills KJ; Rousseau BR; Gonzalez CL
Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 58():99-106. PubMed ID: 24732383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-symbolic numerosities do not automatically activate spatial-numerical associations: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
Cleland AA; Corsico K; White K; Bull R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 31432745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect.
Viarouge A; Hubbard EM; Dehaene S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1484-99. PubMed ID: 24571534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.
Pan Y; Han X; Mei G; Bai X; Chen Y
PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212204. PubMed ID: 30861008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses.
Schwarz W; Keus IM
Percept Psychophys; 2004 May; 66(4):651-64. PubMed ID: 15311664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
