697 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26563118)
1. Accuracy and usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve from computed tomographic coronary angiography: comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging, echocardiographic coronary flow reserve, and invasive fractional flow reserve.
Taguchi E; Nakao K; Hirakawa K; Fukunaga T; Miyamoto S; Sakamoto T
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2017 Jan; 32(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26563118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis.
Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR
Nakanishi R; Osawa K; Ceponiene I; Huth G; Cole J; Kim M; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Li D; Gupta S; Rogers C; Dailing C; Budoff MJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2067-2072. PubMed ID: 28699019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic efficacy of fractional flow reserve with coronary angiography in dual-source computed tomography scanner.
Xia G; Fan D; Yao X; Guan G; Wang J
Acta Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28830299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.
Nørgaard BL; Gormsen LC; Bøtker HE; Parner E; Nielsen LH; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Pedersen K; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Mæng M; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Lassen JF; Jensen JM
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 28862968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fractional flow reserve-CT assessment of coronary stenosis.
Kerut EK; Turner M
Echocardiography; 2018 May; 35(5):730-732. PubMed ID: 29569282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of the Optimal Measurement Point for Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From CTA Using Pressure Wire Assessment as Reference.
Omori H; Hara M; Sobue Y; Kawase Y; Mizukami T; Tanigaki T; Hirata T; Ota H; Okubo M; Hirakawa A; Suzuki T; Kondo T; Leipsic J; Nørgaard BL; Matsuo H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 32876482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study.
Gaur S; Achenbach S; Leipsic J; Mauri L; Bezerra HG; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24268114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the DeFACTO study.
Nakazato R; Park HB; Berman DS; Gransar H; Koo BK; Erglis A; Lin FY; Dunning AM; Budoff MJ; Malpeso J; Leipsic J; Min JK
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):881-9. PubMed ID: 24081777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative computed tomography angiography evaluation of the coronary fractional flow reserve in patients with left anterior descending artery myocardial bridging.
Zhang D; Tian X; Li MY; Zheng WS; Yu Y; Zhang HW; Pan T; Gao BL; Li CY
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2024 May; 44(3):251-259. PubMed ID: 38356324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
Koo HJ; Yang DH; Kim YH; Kang JW; Kang SJ; Kweon J; Kim HJ; Lim TH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 26667445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for the detection of myocardial ischemia with invasive fractional flow reserve as reference: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhuang B; Wang S; Zhao S; Lu M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):712-725. PubMed ID: 31696294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in ischemia-causing coronary stenosis: a meta-analysis.
Ding A; Qiu G; Lin W; Hu L; Lu G; Long X; Hong X; Chen Y; Luo X; Tang Q; Deng D
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 34(12):795-808. PubMed ID: 27796727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia verified by invasive FFR.
Hu X; Yang M; Han L; Du Y
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1987-1996. PubMed ID: 30062537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement of Fractional Flow Reserve Estimated by Computed Tomography With Invasively Measured Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Faulder TI; Prematunga K; Moloi SB; Faulder LE; Jones R; Moxon JV
J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 May; 13(10):e034552. PubMed ID: 38726901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
