367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26563277)
1. The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer.
Helpap B; Ringli D; Tonhauser J; Poser I; Breul J; Gevensleben H; Seifert HH
Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Apr; 22(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 26563277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement of Gleason score on prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: is there improvement with increased number of biopsy cylinders and the 2005 revised Gleason scoring?
Van Praet C; Libbrecht L; D'Hondt F; Decaestecker K; Fonteyne V; Verschuere S; Rottey S; Praet M; De Visschere P; Lumen N;
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Jun; 12(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 24361055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Helpap B; Egevad L
Virchows Arch; 2006 Dec; 449(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 17091254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.
Pierorazio PM; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 23464824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical prostatectomy in Denmark: Survival analysis and temporal trends in clinicopathological parameters with up to 20 years of follow-up.
Heering M; Berg KD; Brasso K; Iversen P; Røder MA
Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 26(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 28317581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Thomsen FB; Folkvaljon Y; Brasso K; Loeb S; Robinson D; Egevad L; Stattin P
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov; 114(6):664-670. PubMed ID: 27511833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined histoarchitectural and cytological biopsy grading improves grading accuracy in low-grade prostate cancer.
Helpap B; Köllermann J
Int J Urol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 22103602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of Gleason grading of low-grade carcinoma of the prostate with therapeutic option of active surveillance.
Helpap B; Kristiansen G; Köllermann J; Adler D; Wernert N; Oehler U; Fellbaum C
Urol Int; 2013; 90(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 23095725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
