These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26563504)

  • 1. Application of a hazard-based visual predictive check to evaluate parametric hazard models.
    Huh Y; Hutmacher MM
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Feb; 43(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 26563504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kernel-Based Visual Hazard Comparison (kbVHC): a Simulation-Free Diagnostic for Parametric Repeated Time-to-Event Models.
    Goulooze SC; Välitalo PAJ; Knibbe CAJ; Krekels EHJ
    AAPS J; 2017 Nov; 20(1):5. PubMed ID: 29181697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods for estimating the attributable risk in the context of survival analysis.
    Gassama M; Bénichou J; Dartois L; Thiébaut AC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 28114895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of a decreasing hazard of patients with acute coronary syndrome.
    van Geloven N; Martin I; Damman P; de Winter RJ; Tijssen JG; Lopuhaä HP
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1223-38. PubMed ID: 22829475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different parametric proportional hazards models for interval-censored data: a simulation study.
    Gong Q; Fang L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Sep; 36(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 23916917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on estimating treatment effect for time-to-event data in a literature-based meta-analysis.
    Hirooka T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 19283306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hazard function estimators: a simulation study.
    Hess KR; Serachitopol DM; Brown BW
    Stat Med; 1999 Nov; 18(22):3075-88. PubMed ID: 10544307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exponentiated Weibull regression for time-to-event data.
    Khan SA
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2018 Apr; 24(2):328-354. PubMed ID: 28349290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual predictive check of longitudinal models and dropout.
    Hu C; Kondic AG; Roy A
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2024 Dec; 51(6):859-875. PubMed ID: 39154319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the expectation of the log-likelihood with censored data for estimator selection.
    Liquet B; Commenges D
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2004 Dec; 10(4):351-67. PubMed ID: 15690990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of parametric and semi-parametric models with randomly right-censored data by weighted estimators: Two applications in colon cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma datasets.
    Yenilmez İ; Yılmaz E; Kantar YM; Aydın D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):372-387. PubMed ID: 34903099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding the right hazard function for time-to-event modeling: A tutorial and Shiny application.
    Van Wijk RC; Simonsson USH
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2022 Aug; 11(8):991-1001. PubMed ID: 35467083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias and variance reduction in nonparametric estimation of time-dependent accuracy measures.
    Chiang CT; Huang MY; Wang SH
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(28):5247-5266. PubMed ID: 27439986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival curve estimation with dependent left truncated data using Cox's model.
    Mackenzie T
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Oct; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 23104845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardized visual predictive check versus visual predictive check for model evaluation.
    Wang DD; Zhang S
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2012 Jan; 52(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 21257797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness of the quartiles of survival time and survival probability.
    Hemyari P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Aug; 10(3):299-318. PubMed ID: 10959913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A flexible parametric survival model for fitting time to event data in clinical trials.
    Liao JJZ; Liu GF
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Oct; 18(5):555-567. PubMed ID: 31037824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian inference in a piecewise Weibull proportional hazards model with unknown change points.
    Casellas J
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Aug; 124(4):176-84. PubMed ID: 17651319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regression models using parametric pseudo-observations.
    Nygård Johansen M; Lundbye-Christensen S; Thorlund Parner E
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(22):2949-2961. PubMed ID: 32519771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.