362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26563648)
1. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?
Tsertsvadze A; Chen YF; Moher D; Sutcliffe P; McCarthy N
Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():160. PubMed ID: 26563648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conducting systematic evidence reviews: core concepts and lessons learned.
Brown PA; Harniss MK; Schomer KG; Feinberg M; Cullen NK; Johnson KL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Aug; 93(8 Suppl):S177-84. PubMed ID: 22840882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review.
Haby MM; Chapman E; Clark R; Barreto J; Reveiz L; Lavis JN
Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):83. PubMed ID: 27884208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five shared decision-making tools in 5 months: use of rapid reviews to develop decision boxes for seniors living with dementia and their caregivers.
Lawani MA; Valéra B; Fortier-Brochu É; Légaré F; Carmichael PH; Côté L; Voyer P; Kröger E; Witteman H; Rodriguez C; Giguere AM
Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):56. PubMed ID: 28298241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses.
Garritty C; Stevens A; Gartlehner G; King V; Kamel C;
Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):184. PubMed ID: 27793186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3).
Wijnen B; Van Mastrigt G; Redekop WK; Majoie H; De Kinderen R; Evers S
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 Dec; 16(6):723-732. PubMed ID: 27762640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidance on review type selection for health technology assessments: key factors and considerations for deciding when to conduct a de novo systematic review, an update of a systematic review, or an overview of systematic reviews.
Kim JSM; Pollock M; Kaunelis D; Weeks L
Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):206. PubMed ID: 36167611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the usefulness of systematic reviews for policymakers in public health: A case study of overweight and obesity prevention interventions.
Kite J; Indig D; Mihrshahi S; Milat A; Bauman A
Prev Med; 2015 Dec; 81():99-107. PubMed ID: 26303371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews.
Featherstone RM; Dryden DM; Foisy M; Guise JM; Mitchell MD; Paynter RA; Robinson KA; Umscheid CA; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 4():50. PubMed ID: 25925676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a protocol for a systematic review of characteristics and methods applied.
Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):238. PubMed ID: 29197411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Systematic Review Automation Tools on Methodological Quality and Time Taken to Complete Systematic Review Tasks: Case Study.
Clark J; McFarlane C; Cleo G; Ishikawa Ramos C; Marshall S
JMIR Med Educ; 2021 May; 7(2):e24418. PubMed ID: 34057072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3).
van Mastrigt GA; Hiligsmann M; Arts JJ; Broos PH; Kleijnen J; Evers SM; Majoie MH
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 Dec; 16(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 27805469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods.
Polisena J; Garritty C; Kamel C; Stevens A; Abou-Setta AM
Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():26. PubMed ID: 25874967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
