362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26563648)
21. The impact of different inclusion decisions on the comprehensiveness and complexity of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):18. PubMed ID: 30635048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews.
Roqué M; Martínez-García L; Solà I; Alonso-Coello P; Bonfill X; Zamora J
F1000Res; 2020; 9():82. PubMed ID: 33082931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
Hartling L; Guise JM; Hempel S; Featherstone R; Mitchell MD; Motu'apuaka ML; Robinson KA; Schoelles K; Totten A; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Anderson J; Berliner E; Gozu A; Kato E; Paynter R; Umscheid CA
Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 28212677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do evidence summaries increase policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews: A systematic review protocol.
Petkovic J; Welch V; Tugwell P
Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 4():122. PubMed ID: 26411423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Involvement of information specialists and statisticians in systematic reviews.
Waffenschmidt S; Bender R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Apr; 39(1):e22. PubMed ID: 37096439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L
Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):29. PubMed ID: 30670086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses.
Johnson BT; Hennessy EA
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Jul; 233():237-251. PubMed ID: 31233957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessing how information is packaged in rapid reviews for policy-makers and other stakeholders: a cross-sectional study.
Garritty C; Hamel C; Hersi M; Butler C; Monfaredi Z; Stevens A; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Cheng W; Moher D
Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 Sep; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 32993657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. There are challenges in conducting systematic reviews in developing countries: the Jamaican experience.
Bennett NR; Cumberbatch C; Francis DK
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1095-8. PubMed ID: 25797838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [SR/PS-method for using data of primary studies from systematic reviews in the evaluation of health technologies].
Gorenoi V; Hagen A
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(5-6):325-32. PubMed ID: 25066352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Overview of reviews in child health: evidence synthesis and the knowledge base for a specific population.
Thomson D; Foisy M; Oleszczuk M; Wingert A; Chisholm A; Hartling L
Evid Based Child Health; 2013 Jan; 8(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 23878121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study.
Clark J; Glasziou P; Del Mar C; Bannach-Brown A; Stehlik P; Scott AM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():81-90. PubMed ID: 32004673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics.
Strech D; Synofzik M; Marckmann G
J Med Ethics; 2008 Jun; 34(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 18511623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Key Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology.
Knoll T; Omar MI; Maclennan S; Hernández V; Canfield S; Yuan Y; Bruins M; Marconi L; Van Poppel H; N'Dow J; Sylvester R;
Eur Urol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 28917594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias.
Brito JP; Tsapas A; Griebeler ML; Wang Z; Prutsky GJ; Domecq JP; Murad MH; Montori VM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):633-8. PubMed ID: 23510557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Methods for systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a systematic review, comparison, and synthesis of method literature.
Mathes T; Walgenbach M; Antoine SL; Pieper D; Eikermann M
Med Decis Making; 2014 Oct; 34(7):826-40. PubMed ID: 24713694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Rapid Reviews: Sisyphos' Salvation? - An Inventory].
Mattivi JT; Buchberger B
Gesundheitswesen; 2017 May; 79(5):438-442. PubMed ID: 25985227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews.
Aziz T; Compton S; Nassar U; Matthews D; Ansari K; Flores-Mir C
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 40(4):263-78. PubMed ID: 23330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
