363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26563648)
41. Methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of prosthodontic-related systematic reviews.
Aziz T; Compton S; Nassar U; Matthews D; Ansari K; Flores-Mir C
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 40(4):263-78. PubMed ID: 23330989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care.
Crawford C; Boyd C; Jain S; Khorsan R; Jonas W
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Nov; 8():631. PubMed ID: 26525982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
Sullivan SD; Mauskopf JA; Augustovski F; Jaime Caro J; Lee KM; Minchin M; Orlewska E; Penna P; Rodriguez Barrios JM; Shau WY
Value Health; 2014; 17(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24438712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications.
Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Sep; 9(5):331-47. PubMed ID: 21875163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Reviewing the evidence to inform the population of cost-effectiveness models within health technology assessments.
Kaltenthaler E; Tappenden P; Paisley S
Value Health; 2013; 16(5):830-6. PubMed ID: 23947977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Systematic reviews on child welfare services: identifying and disseminating the evidence.
Kornør H; Bergman H; Maayan N; Soares-Weiser K; Bjørndal A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Oct; 21(5):855-60. PubMed ID: 26081348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Perspectives on systematic review protocol registration: a survey amongst stakeholders in the clinical research publication process.
van der Braak K; Heus P; Orelio C; Netterström-Wedin F; Robinson KA; Lund H; Hooft L
Syst Rev; 2023 Dec; 12(1):234. PubMed ID: 38098085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Pitfalls in systematic reviews.
Farquhar C; Vail A
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 18(4):433-9. PubMed ID: 16794425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Use of existing systematic reviews for evidence assessments in infectious disease prevention: a comparative case study.
Harder T; Remschmidt C; Haller S; Eckmanns T; Wichmann O
Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):171. PubMed ID: 27724950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Methods for Developing Evidence Reviews in Short Periods of Time: A Scoping Review.
Abou-Setta AM; Jeyaraman MM; Attia A; Al-Inany HG; Ferri M; Ansari MT; Garritty CM; Bond K; Norris SL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0165903. PubMed ID: 27930662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evidence-based clinical guidelines in Kyrgyz Republic.
Zurdinova AA
Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S45-6. PubMed ID: 26639705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Development of rapid guidelines: 2. A qualitative study with WHO guideline developers.
Florez ID; Morgan RL; Falavigna M; Kowalski SC; Zhang Y; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Santesso N; Wiercioch W; Schünemann HJ
Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):62. PubMed ID: 30005710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.
Tricco AC; Tetzlaff J; Sampson M; Fergusson D; Cogo E; Horsley T; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):422-34. PubMed ID: 18394534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Do policy-makers find commissioned rapid reviews useful?
Moore G; Redman S; Rudge S; Haynes A
Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Feb; 16(1):17. PubMed ID: 29482643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Conflict of Evidence: Resolving Discrepancies When Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-analyses Disagree.
Sylvester RJ; Canfield SE; Lam TB; Marconi L; MacLennan S; Yuan Y; MacLennan G; Norrie J; Omar MI; Bruins HM; Hernández V; Plass K; Van Poppel H; N'Dow J
Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):811-819. PubMed ID: 27914898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews.
King VJ; Stevens A; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Kamel C; Garritty C
Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 11(1):151. PubMed ID: 35906677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
