These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26563648)

  • 61. Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews.
    King VJ; Stevens A; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Kamel C; Garritty C
    Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 11(1):151. PubMed ID: 35906677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare-An integrative review of methodological guidance.
    Weise A; Büchter R; Pieper D; Mathes T
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):760-779. PubMed ID: 32920989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A guide to using technological applications to facilitate systematic reviews.
    Gibbs KD; Loveless J; Crane S
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2022 Dec; 19(6):442-449. PubMed ID: 36380454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A REVIEW OF CHARACTERISTICS AND APPLIED METHODS.
    Luhnen M; Prediger B; Neugebauer EAM; Mathes T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(6):537-546. PubMed ID: 30345948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Evidence synthesis 2.0: how artificial intelligence is making systematic reviews more efficient.].
    Petri D
    Recenti Prog Med; 2023 Jun; 114(6):359-361. PubMed ID: 37229683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Studying the potential impact of automated document classification on scheduling a systematic review update.
    Cohen AM; Ambert K; McDonagh M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Apr; 12():33. PubMed ID: 22515596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The Healthcare Improvement Scotland evidence note rapid review process: providing timely, reliable evidence to inform imperative decisions on healthcare.
    McIntosh HM; Calvert J; Macpherson KJ; Thompson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2016 Jun; 14(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 27058251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Advancing systematic-review methodology in exposure science for environmental health decision making.
    Cohen Hubal EA; Frank JJ; Nachman R; Angrish M; Deziel NC; Fry M; Tornero-Velez R; Kraft A; Lavoie E
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 30(6):906-916. PubMed ID: 32467626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Rapid review: an emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment.
    Khangura S; Polisena J; Clifford TJ; Farrah K; Kamel C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Jan; 30(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24451157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline.
    Silva MT; Silva END; Barreto JOM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29884121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [Selective use of systematic reviews in decision making].
    Burgers JS
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2018 Oct; 162():. PubMed ID: 30379507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Rapid reviews methods series: assessing the appropriateness of conducting a rapid review.
    Garritty C; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Hamel C; Devane D;
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38485206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Rapid review: A review of methods and recommendations based on current evidence.
    Guo Q; Jiang G; Zhao Q; Long Y; Feng K; Gu X; Xu Y; Li Z; Huang J; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2024 Jun; 17(2):434-453. PubMed ID: 38512942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Systematic reviews: Separating fact from fiction.
    Haddaway NR; Bilotta GS
    Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():578-84. PubMed ID: 26371438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The refinement of topics for systematic reviews: lessons and recommendations from the Effective Health Care Program.
    Buckley DI; Ansari MT; Butler M; Soh C; Chang CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 24581296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda.
    Polisena J; Garritty C; Umscheid CA; Kamel C; Samra K; Smith J; Vosilla A
    Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 4():111. PubMed ID: 26407674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review.
    Gates M; Gates A; Guitard S; Pollock M; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):254. PubMed ID: 33148319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Use of existing systematic reviews for the development of evidence-based vaccination recommendations: Guidance from the SYSVAC expert panel.
    Pilic A; Reda S; Jo CL; Burchett H; Bastías M; Campbell P; Gamage D; Henaff L; Kagina B; Külper-Schiek W; Lunny C; Marti M; Muloiwa R; Pieper D; Thomas J; Tunis MC; Younger Z; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2023 Mar; 41(12):1968-1978. PubMed ID: 36804216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Assessing transferability in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations - a review of methodological guidance.
    Weise A; Büchter RB; Pieper D; Mathes T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):52. PubMed ID: 35184733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.