These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. How diverse are diversity assessment methods? A comparative analysis and benchmarking of molecular descriptor space. Koutsoukas A; Paricharak S; Galloway WR; Spring DR; Ijzerman AP; Glen RC; Marcus D; Bender A J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 24289493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ultra-fast 2D and 3D ligand and target descriptors for side effect prediction and network analysis in polypharmacology. Cortés-Cabrera A; Morris GM; Finn PW; Morreale A; Gago F Br J Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 170(3):557-67. PubMed ID: 23826885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Progress in visual representations of chemical space. Osolodkin DI; Radchenko EV; Orlov AA; Voronkov AE; Palyulin VA; Zefirov NS Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015; 10(9):959-73. PubMed ID: 26094796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigating high-dimensional activity landscapes: design and application of the ligand-target differentiation map. Iyer P; Dimova D; Vogt M; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22794307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping of the Available Chemical Space versus the Chemical Universe of Lead-Like Compounds. Lin A; Horvath D; Afonina V; Marcou G; Reymond JL; Varnek A ChemMedChem; 2018 Mar; 13(6):540-554. PubMed ID: 29154440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generative Topographic Mapping of the Docking Conformational Space. Horvath D; Marcou G; Varnek A Molecules; 2019 Jun; 24(12):. PubMed ID: 31216756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diversifying chemical libraries with generative topographic mapping. Lin A; Beck B; Horvath D; Marcou G; Varnek A J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Jul; 34(7):805-815. PubMed ID: 31407224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chemometric analysis of ligand receptor complementarity: identifying Complementary Ligands Based on Receptor Information (CoLiBRI). Oloff S; Zhang S; Sukumar N; Breneman C; Tropsha A J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):844-51. PubMed ID: 16563016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identification of orthologous target pairs with shared active compounds and comparison of organism-specific activity patterns. Dimova D; Stumpfe D; Bajorath J Chem Biol Drug Des; 2015 Nov; 86(5):1105-14. PubMed ID: 25931211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity Mapplet: Interactive Visualization of the Directory of Useful Decoys and ChEMBL in High Dimensional Chemical Spaces. Awale M; Reymond JL J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1509-16. PubMed ID: 26207526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational chemogenomics: is it more than inductive transfer? Brown JB; Okuno Y; Marcou G; Varnek A; Horvath D J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2014 Jun; 28(6):597-618. PubMed ID: 24771144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring of the Conformational Space of Dipeptides by Generative Topographic Mapping. Horvath D; Marcou G; Varnek A Mol Inform; 2018 Jan; 37(1-2):. PubMed ID: 29251441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]