BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26564211)

  • 1. The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review.
    Reith FC; Van den Brande R; Synnot A; Gruen R; Maas AI
    Intensive Care Med; 2016 Jan; 42(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 26564211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors Influencing the Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: A Systematic Review.
    Reith FC; Synnot A; van den Brande R; Gruen RL; Maas AI
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Jun; 80(6):829-839. PubMed ID: 28327922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interrater reliability and predictive validity of the FOUR score coma scale in a pediatric population.
    Cohen J
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2009 Oct; 41(5):261-7; quiz 268-9. PubMed ID: 19835239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interobserver Reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale Scores for Intensive Care Unit Patients.
    Kebapçı A; Dikeç G; Topçu S
    Crit Care Nurse; 2020 Aug; 40(4):e18-e26. PubMed ID: 32737493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-rater reliability of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.
    Fischer M; Rüegg S; Czaplinski A; Strohmeier M; Lehmann A; Tschan F; Hunziker PR; Marsch SC
    Crit Care; 2010; 14(2):R64. PubMed ID: 20398274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A pediatric FOUR score coma scale: interrater reliability and predictive validity.
    Czaikowski BL; Liang H; Stewart CT
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2014 Apr; 46(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 24556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Interobserver reliability of the Glasgow coma scale in critically ill patients with neurological and/or neurosurgical disease].
    Sánchez-Sánchez MM; Sánchez-Izquierdo R; Sánchez-Muñoz EI; Martínez-Yegles I; Fraile-Gamo MP; Arias-Rivera S
    Enferm Intensiva; 2014; 25(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 24308910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of Standardization in the Use of the Glasgow Coma Scale: Results of International Surveys.
    Reith FC; Brennan PM; Maas AI; Teasdale GM
    J Neurotrauma; 2016 Jan; 33(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25951090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale for the emergency department evaluation of poisoned patients.
    Heard K; Bebarta VS
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 15171571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The status of the Glasgow Coma Scale.
    Gabbe BJ; Cameron PA; Finch CF
    Emerg Med (Fremantle); 2003 Aug; 15(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 14631703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85) with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Edinburgh-2 Coma Scale (modified) (E2CS(M)).
    Tesseris J; Pantazidis N; Routsi C; Fragoulakis D
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1991; 110(1-2):65-76. PubMed ID: 1882722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-Rater Reliability Between Critical Care Nurses Performing a Pediatric Modification to the Glasgow Coma Scale.
    Kirschen MP; Snyder M; Smith K; Lourie K; Agarwal K; DiDonato P; Doll A; Zhang B; Mensinger J; Ichord R; Shea JA; Berg RA; Nadkarni V; Topjian A
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2019 Jul; 20(7):660-666. PubMed ID: 30946292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glasgow Coma Scale Scoring is Often Inaccurate.
    Bledsoe BE; Casey MJ; Feldman J; Johnson L; Diel S; Forred W; Gorman C
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Feb; 30(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 25489727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score.
    Wijdicks EF; Bamlet WR; Maramattom BV; Manno EM; McClelland RL
    Ann Neurol; 2005 Oct; 58(4):585-93. PubMed ID: 16178024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research.
    ; Seel RT; Sherer M; Whyte J; Katz DI; Giacino JT; Rosenbaum AM; Hammond FM; Kalmar K; Pape TL; Zafonte R; Biester RC; Kaelin D; Kean J; Zasler N
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 91(12):1795-813. PubMed ID: 21112421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems.
    Kornbluth J; Bhardwaj A
    Neurocrit Care; 2011 Feb; 14(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 20652445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interrater reliability of 3 simplified neurologic scales applied to adults presenting to the emergency department with altered levels of consciousness.
    Gill M; Martens K; Lynch EL; Salih A; Green SM
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 49(4):403-7, 407.e1. PubMed ID: 17141146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of Glasgow Coma Scale in injury assessment: a critical review.
    Zuercher M; Ummenhofer W; Baltussen A; Walder B
    Brain Inj; 2009 May; 23(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 19408162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical use of the Glasgow Coma Scale; a comprehensive narrative review of GCS methodology.
    Middleton PM
    Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2012 Aug; 15(3):170-83. PubMed ID: 22947690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of Robotic Telemedicine for Assessing Critically Ill Patients with the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score and Glasgow Coma Scale.
    Adcock AK; Kosiorek H; Parikh P; Chauncey A; Wu Q; Demaerschalk BM
    Telemed J E Health; 2017 Jul; 23(7):555-560. PubMed ID: 28085631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.