These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26565080)

  • 21. Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast.
    Losken A; Seify H; Denson DD; Paredes AA; Carlson GW
    Ann Plast Surg; 2005 May; 54(5):471-6; discussion 477-8. PubMed ID: 15838205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three-dimensional reconstruction from serial sections in PC-Windows platform by using 3D_Viewer.
    Xu YH; Lahvis G; Edwards H; Pitot HC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Nov; 76(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 15451163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Matching the best viewing angle in depth cameras for biomass estimation based on poplar seedling geometry.
    Andújar D; Fernández-Quintanilla C; Dorado J
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jun; 15(6):12999-3011. PubMed ID: 26053748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system.
    Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In-vivo quantification of human breast deformation associated with the position change from supine to upright.
    Khatam H; Reece GP; Fingeret MC; Markey MK; Ravi-Chandar K
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jan; 37(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 25456398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast.
    Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Dec; 69(12):1609-1613. PubMed ID: 27693271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging.
    Eder M; Grabhorn A; Waldenfels Fv; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Kovacs L
    Surg Innov; 2013 Aug; 20(4):356-64. PubMed ID: 22983806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interactive visualization of four-dimensional ultrasound data.
    Shekhar R; Zagrodsky V
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():485-7. PubMed ID: 15458137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system.
    Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Depth measurements through controlled aberrations of projected patterns.
    Birch GC; Tyo JS; Schwiegerling J
    Opt Express; 2012 Mar; 20(6):6561-74. PubMed ID: 22418539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sensitivity of CIPS-computed PVC location to measurement errors in ECG electrode position: the need for the 3D camera.
    van Dam PM; Gordon JP; Laks M
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 25194874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Determination of repeatability of kinect sensor.
    Bonnechère B; Sholukha V; Jansen B; Omelina L; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 May; 20(5):451-3. PubMed ID: 24617290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a 3D digital photographic imaging system of the human face.
    Kimoto K; Garrett NR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 17302948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring trunk orientation with a CMOS camera: feasibility and accuracy.
    Gissot AS; Barbieri G; Iacobelis M; Paindavoine M; Pérennou D
    Gait Posture; 2007 Oct; 26(4):603-6. PubMed ID: 17257846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction.
    Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 May; 66(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 23402935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast contour and volume changes following subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty over 6 months.
    Eder M; v Waldenfels F; Sichtermann M; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Machens HG; Biemer E; Kovacs L
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Sep; 64(9):1152-60. PubMed ID: 21550866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validity of a computer postural analysis to estimate 3-dimensional rotations and translations of the head from three 2-dimensional digital images.
    Janik TJ; Harrison DE; Cailliet R; Harrison DD; Normand MC; Perron DL
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Feb; 30(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 17320733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional assessment of skin wounds using a standard digital camera.
    Treuillet S; Albouy B; Lucas Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 May; 28(5):752-62. PubMed ID: 19150787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
    Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Three-dimensional breast non-contact measurement].
    Zha XP; DU F; Gao JH; Li SH; Jiang P; Liu SF; Lian YF
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Mar; 25(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 15771988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.