205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26565132)
1. Improving proprioceptive deficits after stroke through robot-assisted training of the upper limb: a pilot case report study.
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
Neurocase; 2016; 22(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 26565132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of exercise training effect with different robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation: a retrospective study.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Delconte C; Mazzone A; Grioni G; Castagna M; Bazzini G; Imarisio C; Maggioni G; Pistarini C
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Apr; 53(2):240-248. PubMed ID: 27676203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-Assisted Reach Training for Improving Upper Extremity Function of Chronic Stroke.
Cho KH; Song WK
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2015 Oct; 237(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 26460793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery of subacute stroke patients: a kinematic approach.
Mazzoleni S; Carrozza MC; Sale P; Franceschini M; Posteraro F; Tiboni M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650503. PubMed ID: 24187318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinematic measures for upper limb motor assessment during robot-mediated training in patients with severe sub-acute stroke.
Duret C; Courtial O; Grosmaire AG
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016; 34(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 26890098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation in sub-acute and chronic stroke: does spontaneous recovery have a limited impact on outcome?
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 24029005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upper Extremity Proprioception After Stroke: Bridging the Gap Between Neuroscience and Rehabilitation.
Findlater SE; Dukelow SP
J Mot Behav; 2017; 49(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 27726645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How could robotic training and botolinum toxin be combined in chronic post stroke upper limb spasticity? A pilot study.
Pennati GV; Da Re C; Messineo I; Bonaiuti D
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Aug; 51(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 25358636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A composite robotic-based measure of upper limb proprioception.
Kenzie JM; Semrau JA; Hill MD; Scott SH; Dukelow SP
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Nov; 14(1):114. PubMed ID: 29132388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients.
Macclellan LR; Bradham DD; Whitall J; Volpe B; Wilson PD; Ohlhoff J; Meister C; Hogan N; Krebs HI; Bever CT
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 16680609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Masiero S; Armani M; Ferlini G; Rosati G; Rossi A
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 24316679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a System Architecture for Evaluation and Training of Proprioceptive Deficits of the Upper Limb.
Colombo R; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2018; 2018():4132820. PubMed ID: 29552031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a robot-aided somatosensory training on proprioception and motor function in stroke survivors.
Yeh IL; Holst-Wolf J; Elangovan N; Cuppone AV; Lakshminarayan K; Cappello L; Masia L; Konczak J
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):77. PubMed ID: 33971912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proprioceptive assessment in clinical settings: Evaluation of joint position sense in upper limb post-stroke using a robotic manipulator.
Contu S; Hussain A; Kager S; Budhota A; Deshmukh VA; Kuah CWK; Yam LHL; Xiang L; Chua KSG; Masia L; Campolo D
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0183257. PubMed ID: 29161264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliable and valid robot-assisted assessments of hand proprioceptive, motor and sensorimotor impairments after stroke.
Zbytniewska M; Kanzler CM; Jordan L; Salzmann C; Liepert J; Lambercy O; Gassert R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 Jul; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 34271954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in chronic and subacute stroke patients: a kinematic analysis.
Mazzoleni S; Sale P; Tiboni M; Franceschini M; Carrozza MC; Posteraro F
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Oct; 92(10 Suppl 2):e26-37. PubMed ID: 24052027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
