141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2656572)
1. Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy?
Moss SE; Meuer SM; Klein R; Hubbard LD; Brothers RJ; Klein BE
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1989 May; 30(5):823-8. PubMed ID: 2656572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Williams GA; Scott IU; Haller JA; Maguire AM; Marcus D; McDonald HR
Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 15121388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of dilated fundus examinations with seven-field stereo fundus photographs in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.
Emanuele N; Klein R; Moritz T; Davis MD; Glander K; Anderson R; Reda D; Duckworth W; Abraira C;
J Diabetes Complications; 2009; 23(5):323-9. PubMed ID: 18406632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.
Yang Y; Vitale S; Ding Y; O'Connell SR; Alexander J; Bressler NM; Schachat AP; Zeimer R
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 12569999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Joslin Vision Network Validation Study: pilot image stabilization phase.
Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Cavallerano J; Gardner WK; Strong J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1998 Nov; 69(11):699-710. PubMed ID: 9844322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test.
Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mosaics versus Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy seven standard fields for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.
Li HK; Esquivel A; Hubbard LD; Florez-Arango JF; Danis RP; Krupinski EA
Retina; 2011 Sep; 31(8):1553-63. PubMed ID: 21522039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group.
Gonzalez ME; Gonzalez C; Stern MP; Arredondo B; Martinez S
Arch Med Res; 1995; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 7620277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quantitative system to evaluate diabetic retinopathy from fundus photographs.
Feman SS; Leonard-Martin TC; Andrews JS; Armbruster CC; Burdge TL; Debelak JD; Lanier A; Fischer AG
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 36(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 7822145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic retinal camera in a primary care setting: to dilate or not to dilate?
Baeza M; Orozco-Beltrán D; Gil-Guillen VF; Pedrera V; Ribera MC; Pertusa S; Merino J
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Mar; 63(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 19222628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
