173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26565898)
21. QTL analysis of sex pheromone blend differences between two closely related moths: Insights into divergence in biosynthetic pathways.
Groot AT; Estock ML; Horovitz JL; Hamilton J; Santangelo RG; Schal C; Gould F
Insect Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Aug; 39(8):568-77. PubMed ID: 19477278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Different roles suggested by sex-biased expression and pheromone binding affinity among three pheromone binding proteins in the pink rice borer, Sesamia inferens (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
Jin JY; Li ZQ; Zhang YN; Liu NY; Dong SL
J Insect Physiol; 2014 Jul; 66():71-9. PubMed ID: 24862154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A male-specific odorant receptor conserved through the evolution of sex pheromones in Ostrinia moth species.
Miura N; Nakagawa T; Tatsuki S; Touhara K; Ishikawa Y
Int J Biol Sci; 2009; 5(4):319-30. PubMed ID: 19421342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The evolution of desaturase gene regulation involved in sex pheromone production in leafroller moths of the genus planotortrix.
Albre J; Steinwender B; Newcomb RD
J Hered; 2013; 104(5):627-38. PubMed ID: 23894191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multiple Δ11-desaturase genes selectively used for sex pheromone biosynthesis are conserved in Ostrinia moth genomes.
Fujii T; Yasukochi Y; Rong Y; Matsuo T; Ishikawa Y
Insect Biochem Mol Biol; 2015 Jun; 61():62-8. PubMed ID: 25940818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identification and Expression Profiles of Sex Pheromone Biosynthesis and Transport Related Genes in Spodoptera litura.
Zhang YN; Zhu XY; Fang LP; He P; Wang ZQ; Chen G; Sun L; Ye ZF; Deng DG; Li JB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140019. PubMed ID: 26445454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pheromones and Barcoding Delimit Boundaries between Cryptic Species in the Primitive Moth Genus Eriocrania (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae).
Lassance JM; Svensson GP; Kozlov MV; Francke W; Löfstedt C
J Chem Ecol; 2019 Jun; 45(5-6):429-439. PubMed ID: 31152352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A plant factory for moth pheromone production.
Ding BJ; Hofvander P; Wang HL; Durrett TP; Stymne S; Löfstedt C
Nat Commun; 2014 Feb; 5():3353. PubMed ID: 24569486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Heritable variation of sex pheromone composition and the potential for evolution of resistance to pheromone-based control of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
Svensson GP; Ryne C; Löfstedt C
J Chem Ecol; 2002 Jul; 28(7):1447-61. PubMed ID: 12199506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Global transcriptional analysis of pheromone biosynthesis-related genes in the female turnip moth, Agrotis segetum (Noctuidae) using a custom-made cDNA microarray.
Strandh M; Johansson T; Löfstedt C
Insect Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Jul; 39(7):484-9. PubMed ID: 19376228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evolution of multicomponent pheromone signals in small ermine moths involves a single fatty-acyl reductase gene.
Liénard MA; Hagström AK; Lassance JM; Löfstedt C
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jun; 107(24):10955-60. PubMed ID: 20534481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Asian corn borer pheromone binding protein 3, a candidate for evolving specificity to the 12-tetradecenyl acetate sex pheromone.
Allen JE; Wanner KW
Insect Biochem Mol Biol; 2011 Mar; 41(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 21056664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mosaic Evolution of Molecular Pathways for Sex Pheromone Communication in a Butterfly.
Nieberding CM; Beldade P; Baumlé V; San Martin G; Arun A; Lognay G; Montagné N; Bastin-Héline L; Jacquin-Joly E; Noirot C; Klopp C; Visser B
Genes (Basel); 2022 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanism for saltational shifts in pheromone communication systems.
Baker TC
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Oct; 99(21):13368-70. PubMed ID: 12374851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Identification of genes involved in sex pheromone biosynthesis and metabolic pathway in the Chinese oak silkworm, Antheraea pernyi.
Wang QH; Gong Q; Fang SM; Liu YQ; Zhang Z; Yu QY
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Nov; 163():1487-1497. PubMed ID: 32755713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantitative genetics of signal evolution: a comparison of the pheromonal signal in two populations of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni.
Gemeno C; Moore AJ; Preziosi RF; Haynes KF
Behav Genet; 2001 Mar; 31(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 11545533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lipases and carboxylesterases affect moth sex pheromone compounds involved in interspecific mate recognition.
de Fouchier A; Fruitet E; Lievers R; Kuperus P; Emerson J; Gould F; Heckel DG; Groot AT
Nat Commun; 2023 Nov; 14(1):7505. PubMed ID: 37980401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Transcriptome comparison of the sex pheromone glands from two sibling Helicoverpa species with opposite sex pheromone components.
Li ZQ; Zhang S; Luo JY; Wang CY; Lv LM; Dong SL; Cui JJ
Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():9324. PubMed ID: 25792497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative transcriptomics of the pheromone glands provides new insights into the differentiation of sex pheromone between two host populations of Chilo suppressalis.
Guo S; Tian Z; Quan WL; Sun D; Liu W; Wang XP
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):3499. PubMed ID: 32103103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Genetic basis of sex pheromone blend difference between Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
Wang HL; Ming QL; Zhao CH; Wang CZ
J Insect Physiol; 2008 May; 54(5):813-7. PubMed ID: 18405915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]