258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26565990)
1. Risk Factors for Dehiscence of Stapled Functional End-to-End Intestinal Anastomoses in Dogs: 53 Cases (2001-2012).
Snowdon KA; Smeak DD; Chiang S
Vet Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 26565990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency of Dehiscence in Hand-Sutured and Stapled Intestinal Anastomoses in Dogs.
Duell JR; Thieman Mankin KM; Rochat MC; Regier PJ; Singh A; Luther JK; Mison MB; Leeman JJ; Budke CM
Vet Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 26731599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of intraoperative leak testing of small intestinal anastomoses performed by hand-sewn and stapled techniques in dogs: 131 cases (2008-2019).
Mullen KM; Regier PJ; Fox-Alvarez WA; Case JB; Ellison GW; Colee J
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 May; 258(9):991-998. PubMed ID: 33856865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of preoperative septic peritonitis and anastomotic technique on the dehiscence of enterectomy sites in dogs: A retrospective review of 210 anastomoses.
Davis DJ; Demianiuk RM; Musser J; Podsiedlik M; Hauptman J
Vet Surg; 2018 Jan; 47(1):125-129. PubMed ID: 28885694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-abdominal complications following intestinal anastomoses by suture and staple techniques in dogs.
DePompeo CM; Bond L; George YE; Mezzles MJ; Brourman JD; Chandler JC; Murphy SM; Pike F; Mason DR
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2018 Aug; 253(4):437-443. PubMed ID: 30058972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of suture reinforcement for stapled intestinal anastomoses: 77 dogs (2008-2018).
Sumner SM; Regier PJ; Case JB; Ellison GW
Vet Surg; 2019 Oct; 48(7):1188-1193. PubMed ID: 31270826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of cryopoor plasma for albumin replacement and continuous antimicrobial infusion for treatment of septic peritonitis in a dog.
Ropski MK; Guillaumin J; Monnig AA; Townsend K; McLoughlin MA
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2017 May; 27(3):348-356. PubMed ID: 28135411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of disposable skin staples for intestinal resection and anastomosis in 63 dogs: 2000 to 2014.
Rosenbaum JM; Coolman BR; Davidson BL; Daly ML; Rexing JF; Eatroff AE
J Small Anim Pract; 2016 Nov; 57(11):631-636. PubMed ID: 27709619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified functional end-to-end stapled intestinal anastomosis: technique and clinical results in 15 dogs.
White RN
J Small Anim Pract; 2008 Jun; 49(6):274-81. PubMed ID: 18373543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Review of Normal Intestinal Healing, Intestinal Anastomosis, and the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Intestinal Dehiscence in Foreign Body Obstructions in Dogs.
Mullen KM; Regier PJ; Ellison GW; Londoño L
Top Companion Anim Med; 2020 Nov; 41():100457. PubMed ID: 32823156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of short-term outcomes and potential risk factors for death and intestinal dehiscence following full-thickness large intestinal incisions in dogs.
Latimer CR; Lux CN; Grimes JA; Benitez ME; Culp WTN; Ben-Aderet D; Brown DC
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2019 Oct; 255(8):915-925. PubMed ID: 31573871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of patient outcomes following enterotomy versus intestinal resection and anastomosis for treatment of intestinal foreign bodies in dogs.
Lopez DJ; Holm SA; Korten B; Baum JI; Flanders JA; Sumner JP
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 Jun; 258(12):1378-1385. PubMed ID: 34061615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for leakage following intestinal anastomosis in dogs and cats: 115 cases (1991-2000).
Ralphs SC; Jessen CR; Lipowitz AJ
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2003 Jul; 223(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 12839067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intestinal incisional dehiscence rate following enterotomy for foreign body removal in 247 dogs.
Strelchik A; Coleman MC; Scharf VF; Stoneburner RM; Thieman Mankin KM
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2019 Sep; 255(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 31478820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disposable skin staplers for closure of linear gastrointestinal incisions in dogs.
Schwartz Z; Coolman BR
Vet Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 29218712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open intestinal anastomosis with surgical stapling equipment in 24 dogs and cats.
Ullman SL; Pavletic MM; Clark GN
Vet Surg; 1991; 20(6):385-91. PubMed ID: 1369520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gastrointestinal thickness, duration, and leak pressure of six intestinal anastomoses in dogs.
Mullen KM; Regier PJ; Waln M; Fox-Alvarez WA; Colee J
Vet Surg; 2020 Oct; 49(7):1315-1325. PubMed ID: 32697359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term prospective evaluation of intestinal anastomosis using stainless steel staples in 14 dogs.
Benlloch-Gonzalez M; Gomes E; Bouvy B; Poncet C
Can Vet J; 2015 Jul; 56(7):715-22. PubMed ID: 26130833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of data from 35 dogs pertaining to dehiscence following intestinal resection and anastomosis.
Mouat EE; Davis GJ; Drobatz KJ; Wallace KA
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2014; 50(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 24855087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One stage functional end-to-end stapled intestinal anastomosis and resection performed by nonexpert surgeons for the treatment of small intestinal obstruction in 30 dogs.
Jardel N; Hidalgo A; Leperlier D; Manassero M; Gomes A; Bedu AS; Moissonnier P; Fayolle P; Begon D; Riquois E; Viateau V
Vet Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 21223317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
