BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26566944)

  • 1. The job of 'ethics committees'.
    Moore A; Donnelly A
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):481-487. PubMed ID: 26566944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee.
    Koepsell D; Brinkman WP; Pont S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):1033-48. PubMed ID: 24938695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees.
    Roche E; King R; Mohan HM; Gavin B; McNicholas F
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Sep; 39(9):591-3. PubMed ID: 23204324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cross-sectional survey to investigate community understanding of medical research ethics committees.
    Fritschi L; Kelsall HL; Loff B; Slegers C; Zion D; Glass DC
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 41(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 25605609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.
    Coleman CH; Bouësseau MC
    BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 9():6. PubMed ID: 18373857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Code-consistent ethics review: defence of a hybrid account.
    Schaefer GO
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):494-495. PubMed ID: 27174807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The structure and functioning of ethical review committees.
    Gutteridge F; Bankowski Z; Curran W; Dunne J
    Soc Sci Med; 1982; 16(20):1791-800. PubMed ID: 7178924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
    Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
    Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
    Dyck M; Allen G
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 22865925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International trends in ethical review of medical research.
    Miller E
    IRB; 1981 Oct; 3(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11650529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unequal protection for patient rights: the divide between university and health ethics committees.
    Tolich M; Baldwin KM
    J Bioeth Inq; 2005; 2(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 16025617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human experimentation and medical ethics.
    Gutteridge F
    Aust Nurses J; 1982 May; 11(10):23-5. PubMed ID: 11643895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vulnerable persons in biomedical research: 50 years after the Nuremberg Code.
    Dickens BM
    J Int Bioethique; 1999; 10(1-2):13-23. PubMed ID: 11806429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement.
    Edwards SJ; Ashcroft R; Kirchin S
    Bioethics; 2004 Sep; 18(5):408-27. PubMed ID: 15462024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics creep or governance creep? Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECS).
    Gorman SM
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2011 Sep; 29(4):14.1-16. PubMed ID: 22397089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The 'ethics committee' job is administrative: a response to commentaries.
    Moore AJ
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):495-496. PubMed ID: 29599415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Module five: implementation of ethics review.
    Dhai A
    Dev World Bioeth; 2005 Mar; 5(1):73-91. PubMed ID: 15748179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it appropriate for research ethics committees to make judgements about the scientific quality of research proposals?
    Brecher B; Gardener G; Velepič M; Walsh A; Belshaw C; Holland S
    Nurs Ethics; 2011 Jan; 18(1):122-5. PubMed ID: 21285203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical review and the assessment of research proposals using qualitative research methods.
    Daly J; Bandyopadhyay M; Riggs E; Williamson L
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2008 Jul; 27(3):43-53. PubMed ID: 19418905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.