These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26567163)

  • 1. Impact of consensus contours from multiple PET segmentation methods on the accuracy of functional volume delineation.
    Schaefer A; Vermandel M; Baillet C; Dewalle-Vignion AS; Modzelewski R; Vera P; Massoptier L; Parcq C; Gibon D; Fechter T; Nemer U; Gardin I; Nestle U
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):911-924. PubMed ID: 26567163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of a semi-automated contrast-oriented algorithm for tumor segmentation in retrospectively gated PET images: phantom and clinical validation.
    Carles M; Fechter T; Nemer U; Nanko N; Mix M; Nestle U; Schaefer A
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(24):9227-51. PubMed ID: 26576926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining multiple FDG-PET radiotherapy target segmentation methods to reduce the effect of variable performance of individual segmentation methods.
    McGurk RJ; Bowsher J; Lee JA; Das SK
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042501. PubMed ID: 23556917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid Contour-based Segmentation for
    Besson FL; Henry T; Meyer C; Chevance V; Roblot V; Blanchet E; Arnould V; Grimon G; Chekroun M; Mabille L; Parent F; Seferian A; Bulifon S; Montani D; Humbert M; Chaumet-Riffaud P; Lebon V; Durand E
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):277-284. PubMed ID: 29613842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is STAPLE algorithm confident to assess segmentation methods in PET imaging?
    Dewalle-Vignion AS; Betrouni N; Baillet C; Vermandel M
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(24):9473-91. PubMed ID: 26584044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Dirichlet process mixture model for automatic (18)F-FDG PET image segmentation: Validation study on phantoms and on lung and esophageal lesions.
    Giri MG; Cavedon C; Mazzarotto R; Ferdeghini M
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2491. PubMed ID: 27147360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tumour delineation in oesophageal cancer - A prospective study of delineation in PET and CT with and without endoscopically placed clip markers.
    Thomas L; Lapa C; Bundschuh RA; Polat B; Sonke JJ; Guckenberger M
    Radiother Oncol; 2015 Aug; 116(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 26364886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of F18-FDG PET radiomic features for different cervical tumor segmentation methods, gray-level discretization, and reconstruction algorithms.
    Altazi BA; Zhang GG; Fernandez DC; Montejo ME; Hunt D; Werner J; Biagioli MC; Moros EG
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):32-48. PubMed ID: 28891217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative imaging: Erring patterns in manual delineation of PET-imaged lung lesions.
    Yang F; Young L; Yang Y
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Dec; 141():78-85. PubMed ID: 31495515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Novel Framework for Automated Segmentation and Labeling of Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Lung Tumors in [
    Soufi M; Kamali-Asl A; Geramifar P; Rahmim A
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Jun; 19(3):456-468. PubMed ID: 27770402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 18F-FDG-PET partial volume effect correction using a modified recovery coefficient approach based on functional volume and local contrast: physical validation and clinical feasibility in oncology.
    Anouan KJ; Lelandais B; Edet-Sanson A; Ruan S; Vera P; Gardin I; Hapdey S
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Sep; 61(3):301-313. PubMed ID: 26407135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Background based Gaussian mixture model lesion segmentation in PET.
    Soffientini CD; De Bernardi E; Zito F; Castellani M; Baselli G
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2662. PubMed ID: 27147375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A smart and operator independent system to delineate tumours in Positron Emission Tomography scans.
    Comelli A; Stefano A; Russo G; Sabini MG; Ippolito M; Bignardi S; Petrucci G; Yezzi A
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Nov; 102():1-15. PubMed ID: 30219733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contourlet-based active contour model for PET image segmentation.
    Abdoli M; Dierckx RA; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082507. PubMed ID: 23927352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET.
    Belhassen S; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1309-24. PubMed ID: 20384268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer.
    Nestle U; Kremp S; Schaefer-Schuler A; Sebastian-Welsch C; Hellwig D; Rübe C; Kirsch CM
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1342-8. PubMed ID: 16085592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of zeolites to generate PET phantoms for the validation of quantification strategies in oncology.
    Zito F; De Bernardi E; Soffientini C; Canzi C; Casati R; Gerundini P; Baselli G
    Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5353-61. PubMed ID: 22957603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative assessment of statistical brain MR image segmentation algorithms and their impact on partial volume correction in PET.
    Zaidi H; Ruest T; Schoenahl F; Montandon ML
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1591-607. PubMed ID: 16828315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.
    Hatt M; Lee JA; Schmidtlein CR; Naqa IE; Caldwell C; De Bernardi E; Lu W; Das S; Geets X; Gregoire V; Jeraj R; MacManus MP; Mawlawi OR; Nestle U; Pugachev AB; Schöder H; Shepherd T; Spezi E; Visvikis D; Zaidi H; Kirov AS
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):e1-e42. PubMed ID: 28120467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of 11 automated PET segmentation methods in lymphoma.
    Weisman AJ; Kieler MW; Perlman S; Hutchings M; Jeraj R; Kostakoglu L; Bradshaw TJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(23):235019. PubMed ID: 32906088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.