These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26567324)

  • 1. OVERVIEW, PRACTICAL TIPS AND POTENTIAL PITFALLS OF USING AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL IN CT: SIEMENS CARE DOSE 4D.
    Söderberg M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):84-91. PubMed ID: 26567324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. INFLUENCE OF LOCALIZER AND SCAN DIRECTION ON THE DOSE-REDUCING EFFECT OF AUTOMATIC TUBE CURRENT MODULATION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
    Franck C; Bacher K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):136-42. PubMed ID: 27056145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IMPLICATIONS OF PATIENT CENTRING ON ORGAN DOSE IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
    Kataria B; Sandborg M; Althén JN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):130-5. PubMed ID: 26743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Low Can We Go in Radiation Dose for the Data-Completion Scan on a Research Whole-Body Photon-Counting Computed Tomography System.
    Yu Z; Leng S; Li Z; Halaweish AF; Kappler S; Ritman EL; McCollough CH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(4):663-70. PubMed ID: 27096399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
    Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms.
    McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. White Paper of the Society of Computed Body Tomography and Magnetic Resonance on Dual-Energy CT, Part 2: Radiation Dose and Iodine Sensitivity.
    Foley WD; Shuman WP; Siegel MJ; Sahani DV; Boll DT; Bolus DN; De Cecco CN; Kaza RK; Morgan DE; Schoepf UJ; Vrtiska TJ; Yeh BM; Berland LL
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(6):846-850. PubMed ID: 27768619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-dose computed tomography scans with automatic exposure control for patients of different ages undergoing cardiac PET/CT and SPECT/CT.
    Yang CC; Yang BH; Tu CY; Wu TH; Liu SH
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jun; 38(6):546-555. PubMed ID: 28430740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D automatic exposure control for 64-detector row CT: radiation dose reduction in chest phantom study.
    Matsumoto K; Ohno Y; Koyama H; Kono A; Inokawa H; Onishi Y; Nogami M; Takenaka D; Araki T; Sugimura K
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):522-7. PubMed ID: 19836179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of mA Reduction on Image Quality Parameters and Patient Dose in Computed Tomography Imaging.
    Saeed RS; Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah KH; Al Enezi OJ
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 26721839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests.
    Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N; Elmore A
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Liver Phantom Study: CT Radiation Dose Reduction and Different Image Reconstruction Algorithms Affect Diagnostic Quality.
    Brænne KR; Flinder LI; Almenning Martiniussen M; Jensen K; Reisse CH; Julsrud L; Martinsen AC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):735-9. PubMed ID: 27224229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of age-specific Japanese head phantoms for dose evaluation in paediatric head CT examinations.
    Yamauchi-Kawaura C; Fujii K; Akahane K; Yamauchi M; Narai K; Aoyama T; Katsu T; Obara S; Imai K; Ikeda M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):188-201. PubMed ID: 24821932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
    Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [X-ray exposure dose control for x-ray CT system].
    Takagi H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 12766284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.