100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26568670)
1. A Comparison of the Accuracy of Linear Measurements Obtained from Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Images and Digital Models.
Creed B; Kau CH; English JD; Xia JJ; Lee RP
Semin Orthod; 2011 Mar; 17(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 26568670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Lightheart KG; English JD; Kau CH; Akyalcin S; Bussa HI; McGrory KR; McGrory KJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 22640670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index.
Kau CH; Littlefield J; Rainy N; Nguyen JT; Creed B
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 20050733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models.
Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography: A volumetric and linear analysis.
Ponder SN; Benavides E; Kapila S; Hatch NE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23273363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in predicting the diameter of unerupted teeth.
Nguyen E; Boychuk D; Orellana M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):e59-66. PubMed ID: 21803235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of digital American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index measurements.
Dragstrem K; Galang-Boquiren MT; Obrez A; Costa Viana MG; Grubb JE; Kusnoto B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jul; 148(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 26124028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological accuracy of digital and manual model analysis in orthodontics - A retrospective clinical study.
Lippold C; Kirschneck C; Schreiber K; Abukiress S; Tahvildari A; Moiseenko T; Danesh G
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Jul; 62():103-9. PubMed ID: 25917690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital casts in orthodontics: a comparison of 4 software systems.
Westerlund A; Tancredi W; Ransjö M; Bresin A; Psonis S; Torgersson O
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25836011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
