178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2656890)
1. [A modified Shirodkar procedure--double cervical cerclage with an auxiliary loop].
Tsuji A; Watanabe T
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Feb; 41(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 2656890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical internal os cerclage: description of a new technique and comparison with Shirodkar operation.
Caspi E; Schneider DF; Mor Z; Langer R; Weinraub Z; Bukovsky I
Am J Perinatol; 1990 Oct; 7(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 2222626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of cervical cerclage at term: remove the suture in labor?
Abdelhak YE; Aronov R; Roque H; Young BK
J Perinat Med; 2000; 28(6):453-7. PubMed ID: 11155431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simplified approach to Shirodkar cerclage procedure.
Druzin ML; Berkeley AS
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Apr; 162(4):375-6. PubMed ID: 3515595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Double cerclage. Cervix insufficiency in the middle trimester and its treatment].
Hochuli E; Vogt HP
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1987 Aug; 47(8):537-8. PubMed ID: 3308626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Control of postoperative vaginal sonographic findings following Shirodkar cerclage].
Böhmer S; Degenhardt F; Unlü C; Jagla K; Bader W
Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1990; 194(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 2198725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical approach to failed cervical cerclage. A report of three cases.
Schulman H; Farmakides G
J Reprod Med; 1985 Aug; 30(8):626-8. PubMed ID: 3900390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Obstetric management of incompetent cervix and bulging fetal membranes.
Schorr SJ; Morales WJ
J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 8728074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of cervical incompetence with cerclage according to Shirodkar. A report on 110 cases.
Kaskarelis D; Lolis D; Papathanassiou Z; Michalas S
Acta Eur Fertil; 1976 Mar; 7(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 961327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Is cervix cerclage a sensible procedure?].
Slot MA; Treffers PE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1983 Oct; 127(40):1813-6. PubMed ID: 6355870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound evaluation of sutures following cervical cerclage for incompetent cervix uteri.
Parulekar SG; Kiwi R
J Ultrasound Med; 1982 Aug; 1(6):223-8. PubMed ID: 6763082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervicovaginal fistula formation: a new complication of Shirodkar cerclage.
Berchuck A; Sokol RJ
Am J Perinatol; 1984 Apr; 1(3):263-5. PubMed ID: 6525215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures.
Harger JH
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Nov; 56(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 7001296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage: initial experience.
Sidhu HK; McElhinney B; Dornan JC
Ulster Med J; 1997 Nov; 66(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 9414940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome of second-trimester, emergency cervical cerclage in patients with no history of cervical incompetence.
Lipitz S; Libshitz A; Oelsner G; Kokia E; Goldenberg M; Mashiach S; Schiff E
Am J Perinatol; 1996 Oct; 13(7):419-22. PubMed ID: 8960611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cerclage of the cervix uteri via a transabdominal route: report of 2 cases].
Lippi UG; Mossa A; Ogata AJ; Garcia SA; Grabert HH
Rev Paul Med; 1989; 107(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 2699536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cerclage of the cervix. Indications and results].
Benz JJ; Litschgi M; Blanchard JR
Fortschr Med; 1974 Sep; 92(26):1030-2. PubMed ID: 4605551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Improved technique of Shirodkar's cervical cerclage operation based on the theological surgery].
Igarashi M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Mar; 45(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 8492014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Laparoscopic cerclage of the isthma].
Von Theobald P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 May; 31(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 12016406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cerclage--its role in the pregnant anomalous uterus.
Golan A; Langer R; Wexler S; Segev E; Niv D; David MP
Int J Fertil; 1990; 35(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 1973922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
