These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26572735)

  • 41. Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios.
    Shechter-Maor G; Haran G; Sadeh-Mestechkin D; Ganor-Paz Y; Fejgin MD; Biron-Shental T
    J Perinatol; 2015 Feb; 35(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 25275693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and cervical prostaglandin gel for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Irion O; Pedrazzoli J; Mermillod B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 9464723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: a double-blind, randomized controlled study.
    Sherman DJ; Frenkel E; Pansky M; Caspi E; Bukovsky I; Langer R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 97(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 11239640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Effectiveness of intracervical catheter as a labor preinduction method].
    Patro-Małysza J; Marciniak B; Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B; Bartosiewicz J; Oleszczuk J
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20232696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Foley catheter for induction of labor: potential barriers to adopting the technique.
    Edwards RK; Szychowski JM; Bodea-Braescu AV; Biggio JR; Lin MG
    J Perinatol; 2015 Dec; 35(12):996-9. PubMed ID: 26468934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Sciscione AC; Nguyen L; Manley J; Pollock M; Maas B; Colmorgen G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 97(4):603-7. PubMed ID: 11275035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Can we predict successful cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal inserts?
    Hiersch L; Borovich A; Gabbay-Benziv R; Maimon-Cohen M; Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 295(2):343-349. PubMed ID: 27928676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas.
    Al-Taani MI
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 16335645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Methods of induction of labor in women with obesity: A secondary analysis of two multicenter randomized controlled trials.
    Croll DMR; De Vaan MDT; Moes SL; Bloemenkamp KWM; Ten Eikelder MLG; De Heus R; Jozwiak M; Kooiman J; Mol BW; Verhoeven CJM; De Boer MA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Mar; 103(3):470-478. PubMed ID: 38183287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin for cervical ripening to induce labor after previous cesarean delivery.
    Korb D; Renard S; Morin C; Merviel P; Sibony O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 301(4):931-940. PubMed ID: 32140810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Intracervical Foley balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A review.
    Greenberg V; Khalifeh A
    Semin Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 39(6):441-3. PubMed ID: 26338441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cervical ripening with the Foley catheter.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Uccella S; Lischetti B; Bolis PF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 May; 97(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 17316649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Sciscione AC; McCullough H; Manley JS; Shlossman PA; Pollock M; Colmorgen GH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 180(1 Pt 1):55-60. PubMed ID: 9914578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial.
    Eser A; Ozkaya E; Abide CY; Eser T; Eser GY; Abike F; Tayyar AT; Eroglu M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 30536117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
    Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhu L; Zhang C; Cao F; Liu Q; Gu X; Xu J; Li J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(48):e13251. PubMed ID: 30508911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Du YM; Zhu LY; Cui LN; Jin BH; Ou JL
    BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):891-899. PubMed ID: 27533177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.