These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26572876)

  • 1. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
    Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
    Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.
    Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R
    Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
    Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
    Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of DNA stabilizers and storage conditions on preserving fecal microbiota profiles.
    Chen CC; Wu WK; Chang CM; Panyod S; Lu TP; Liou JM; Fang YJ; Chuang EY; Wu MS
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Dec; 119(12):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 32111519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions.
    Bundgaard-Nielsen C; Hagstrøm S; Sørensen S
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17367. PubMed ID: 30478355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
    Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
    Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample storage conditions induce post-collection biases in microbiome profiles.
    Jenkins SV; Vang KB; Gies A; Griffin RJ; Jun SR; Nookaew I; Dings RPM
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):227. PubMed ID: 30591021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room?
    Shaw AG; Sim K; Powell E; Cornwell E; Cramer T; McClure ZE; Li MS; Kroll JS
    Microbiome; 2016 Jul; 4(1):40. PubMed ID: 27473284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
    Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Specimen Collection Methodologies and Storage Conditions on the Short-Term Stability of Oral Microbiome Taxonomy.
    Luo T; Srinivasan U; Ramadugu K; Shedden KA; Neiswanger K; Trumble E; Li JJ; McNeil DW; Crout RJ; Weyant RJ; Marazita ML; Foxman B
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 82(18):5519-29. PubMed ID: 27371581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
    Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method Validation for Extraction of DNA from Human Stool Samples for Downstream Microbiome Analysis.
    Neuberger-Castillo L; Hamot G; Marchese M; Sanchez I; Ammerlaan W; Betsou F
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2020 Apr; 18(2):102-116. PubMed ID: 31999474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?
    Papanicolas LE; Choo JM; Wang Y; Leong LEX; Costello SP; Gordon DL; Wesselingh SL; Rogers GB
    EBioMedicine; 2019 Mar; 41():509-516. PubMed ID: 30796005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
    Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of storage temperature, storage time, and Cary-Blair transport medium on the stability of the gut microbiota.
    Nagata N; Tohya M; Takeuchi F; Suda W; Nishijima S; Ohsugi M; Ueki K; Tsujimoto T; Nakamura T; Kawai T; Miyoshi-Akiyama T; Uemura N; Hattori M
    Drug Discov Ther; 2019 Nov; 13(5):256-260. PubMed ID: 31611489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
    Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
    mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
    Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
    Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
    Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.