218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26572997)
1. Accuracy and interobserver variability of the cytologic diagnosis of low-grade urothelial carcinoma in instrumented urinary tract cytology specimens.
McCroskey Z; Pambuccian SE; Kleitherms S; Antic T; Cohen MB; Barkan GA; Wojcik EM
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Dec; 144(6):902-8. PubMed ID: 26572997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is a consistent cytologic diagnosis of low-grade urothelial carcinoma in instrumented urinary tract cytologic specimens possible? A comparison between cytomorphologic features of low-grade urothelial carcinoma and non-neoplastic changes shows extensive overlap, making a reliable diagnosis impossible.
McCroskey Z; Kliethermes S; Bahar B; Barkan GA; Pambuccian SE; Wojcik EM
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2015; 4(2):90-97. PubMed ID: 31051715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional cell groups with disordered nuclei and cellular discohesion (3DDD) are associated with high sensitivity and specificity for cystoscopic urine cytopathological diagnosis of low-grade urothelial neoplasia.
Mai KT; Ball CG; Kos Z; Belanger EC; Islam S; Sekhon H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Jul; 42(7):555-63. PubMed ID: 24273035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytologic evaluation of upper urinary tract specimens: An institutional retrospective study using The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology second edition with histopathologic follow-up.
Khajir G; Sun T; Wang H; Sprenkle PC; Adeniran AJ; Cai G; Levi AW
Cytopathology; 2024 Mar; 35(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 37916579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-grade urothelial carcinoma: reappraisal of the cytologic criteria on ThinPrep.
Xin W; Raab SS; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Sep; 29(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 12951678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urine cytology findings in patients with biopsy-confirmed urothelial carcinoma in situ with plasmacytoid features.
Nichols MM; Reynolds JP; McKenney JK; Nicolas MM; McIntire PJ; Policarpio-Nicolas MLC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Oct; 129(10):798-804. PubMed ID: 33900681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytologic and cystoscopic predictors of recurrence and progression in patients with low-grade urothelial carcinoma.
Jackson J; Barkan GA; Kapur U; Wojcik EM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 121(7):398-402. PubMed ID: 23364860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.
Celik B; Kavas G
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 36731438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of the current World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists bladder neoplasm classification system on urine cytology results.
Curry JL; Wojcik EM
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 12115301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased accuracy of a novel mRNA-based urine test for bladder cancer surveillance.
Pichler R; Fritz J; Tulchiner G; Klinglmair G; Soleiman A; Horninger W; Klocker H; Heidegger I
BJU Int; 2018 Jan; 121(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 28941000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of a comprehensive, urothelial carcinoma-specific next-generation sequencing panel in urine cytology and bladder tumor specimens.
Sun T; Hutchinson L; Tomaszewicz K; Caporelli ML; Meng X; McCauley K; Fischer AH; Cosar EF; Cornejo KM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Jul; 129(7):537-547. PubMed ID: 33539671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer. An interobserver multicenter analysis.
Raitanen MP; Aine R; Rintala E; Kallio J; Rajala P; Juusela H; Tammela TL;
Eur Urol; 2002 Mar; 41(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 12180229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Urinary cytology for the detection of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder--a flawed adjunct to cystoscopy?
Bolenz C; West AM; Ortiz N; Kabbani W; Lotan Y
Urol Oncol; 2013 Apr; 31(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 21414815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Johns Hopkins Hospital template for urologic cytology samples: part I-creating the template.
Rosenthal DL; Vandenbussche CJ; Burroughs FH; Sathiyamoorthy S; Guan H; Owens C
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 23192944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Template on urine cytology.
Wu HH; Redelman M; Chen S; Grignon DJ; Cramer HM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Aug; 43(8):593-7. PubMed ID: 25721938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urinary CYFRA 21.1 is not a useful marker for the detection of recurrences in the follow-up of superficial bladder cancer.
Fernandez-Gomez J; Rodríguez-Martínez JJ; Barmadah SE; García Rodríguez J; Allende DM; Jalon A; Gonzalez R; Alvarez-Múgica M
Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1267-74. PubMed ID: 17207912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytologic diagnosis of low-grade papillary urothelial neoplasms (low malignant potential and low-grade carcinoma) in the context of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification.
Whisnant RE; Bastacky SI; Ohori NP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):186-90. PubMed ID: 12672093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunocyt test improves the diagnostic accuracy of urinary cytology: results of a French multicenter study.
Pfister C; Chautard D; Devonec M; Perrin P; Chopin D; Rischmann P; Bouchot O; Beurton D; Coulange C; Rambeaud JJ
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):921-4. PubMed ID: 12576813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reclassification of urinary cytology regarding The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology with cytohistological correlation demonstrates high sensitivity for high-grade urothelial carcinoma.
Anbardar MH; Monjazeb R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 May; 48(5):446-452. PubMed ID: 31976626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology with histologic follow-up.
Rohra P; Ocampo Gonzalez FA; Yan L; Mir F; Furlan K; Basu S; Barua A; Cheng L; Park JW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jun; 49(6):691-699. PubMed ID: 33600080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
