These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26573104)

  • 1. US Supreme Court to hear challenge to restrictive Texas abortion law.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2015 Nov; 351():h6177. PubMed ID: 26573104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US Supreme Court to review "partial birth abortion" law.
    Tanne J
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7540):506. PubMed ID: 16513699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. North Dakota passes restrictive abortion laws that may reach the Supreme Court.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2096. PubMed ID: 23558447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US abortion: Supreme Court allows Texas to continue to ban emergency abortions.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2024 Oct; 387():q2234. PubMed ID: 39389609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US Supreme Court approves ban on "partial birth abortion".
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2007 Apr; 334(7599):866-7. PubMed ID: 17463433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US Supreme Court delays enforcement of strict Texas abortion law.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6304. PubMed ID: 25354191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US Supreme Court strikes down key provisions of restrictive Texas abortion law.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3602. PubMed ID: 27353183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion-pill challenge provokes doubt from US Supreme Court.
    Lenharo M
    Nature; 2024 Apr; 628(8006):17-18. PubMed ID: 38538891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion Counseling, Liability, and the First Amendment.
    Watson K; Oberman M
    N Engl J Med; 2023 Aug; 389(7):663-667. PubMed ID: 37585635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The current state of abortion law and practice in Northern Ireland.
    Daniels P; Campbell P; Clinton A
    Br J Nurs; 2013 Mar 28-Apr 10; 22(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 23901450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Texas court rejects legal challenge by women denied abortions for dangerous pregnancies.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2024 Jun; 385():q1216. PubMed ID: 38830684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech.
    Weeks AB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Whose Responsibility Is It to Define Exceptions in Abortion Bans?
    Shachar C; Baruch S; King LP
    JAMA; 2024 Feb; 331(7):559-560. PubMed ID: 38252432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The US Supreme Court and the Future of Reproductive Health.
    Rosenbaum S
    Milbank Q; 2016 Mar; 94(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 26750425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vigilante Injustice - Deputizing and Weaponizing the Public to Stop Abortions.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Oct; 385(16):1441-1443. PubMed ID: 34551227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infant Deaths After Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy.
    Gemmill A; Margerison CE; Stuart EA; Bell SO
    JAMA Pediatr; 2024 Aug; 178(8):784-791. PubMed ID: 38913344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications for women of Louisiana's law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges.
    Roberts SC; Fuentes L; Kriz R; Williams V; Upadhyay UD
    Contraception; 2015 May; 91(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 25744615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.