BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26573612)

  • 1. Functional analysis and transcriptional output of the Göttingen minipig genome.
    Heckel T; Schmucki R; Berrera M; Ringshandl S; Badi L; Steiner G; Ravon M; Küng E; Kuhn B; Kratochwil NA; Schmitt G; Kiialainen A; Nowaczyk C; Daff H; Khan AP; Lekolool I; Pelle R; Okoth E; Bishop R; Daubenberger C; Ebeling M; Certa U
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():932. PubMed ID: 26573612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minipig and beagle animal model genomes aid species selection in pharmaceutical discovery and development.
    Vamathevan JJ; Hall MD; Hasan S; Woollard PM; Xu M; Yang Y; Li X; Wang X; Kenny S; Brown JR; Huxley-Jones J; Lyon J; Haselden J; Min J; Sanseau P
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Jul; 270(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 23602889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutive expression of CYP3A mRNA in Bama miniature pig tissues.
    Shang H; Guo K; Liu Y; Yang J; Wei H
    Gene; 2013 Jul; 524(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 23618816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Aachen Minipig: Phenotype, Genotype, Hematological and Biochemical Characterization, and Comparison to the Göttingen Minipig.
    Pawlowsky K; Ernst L; Steitz J; Stopinski T; Kögel B; Henger A; Kluge R; Tolba R
    Eur Surg Res; 2017; 58(5-6):193-203. PubMed ID: 28433992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of Pharmacokinetics in the Göttingen Minipig with Reference Human Drugs: An In Vitro and In Vivo Approach.
    Lignet F; Sherbetjian E; Kratochwil N; Jones R; Suenderhauf C; Otteneder MB; Singer T; Parrott N
    Pharm Res; 2016 Oct; 33(10):2565-79. PubMed ID: 27469324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adult porcine genome-wide DNA methylation patterns support pigs as a biomedical model.
    Schachtschneider KM; Madsen O; Park C; Rund LA; Groenen MA; Schook LB
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():743. PubMed ID: 26438392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organ data from the developing Göttingen minipig: first steps towards a juvenile PBPK model.
    Van Peer E; Downes N; Casteleyn C; Van Ginneken C; Weeren A; Van Cruchten S
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Apr; 43(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 26687458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid pig versus Gottingen minipig-derived cartilage and chondrocytes show pig line-dependent differences.
    Müller C; Marzahn U; Kohl B; El Sayed K; Lohan A; Meier C; Ertel W; Schulze-Tanzil G
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2013 Nov; 238(11):1210-22. PubMed ID: 24064110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterisation of intravenous pharmacokinetics in Göttingen minipig and clearance prediction using established
    Langthaler K; Jones CR; Christensen RB; Eneberg E; Brodin B; Bundgaard C
    Xenobiotica; 2022 Jun; 52(6):591-607. PubMed ID: 36000364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expression studies of the obesity candidate gene FTO in pig.
    Madsen MB; Birck MM; Fredholm M; Cirera S
    Anim Biotechnol; 2010; 21(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 20024787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of Göttingen minipigs for Prediction of Human Pharmacokinetic Profiles After Dermal Drug Application.
    Yamamoto S; Karashima M; Sano N; Fukushi C; Tohyama K; Arai Y; Hirabayashi H; Amano N
    Pharm Res; 2017 Nov; 34(11):2415-2424. PubMed ID: 28828717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive analysis of long non-coding RNAs highlights their spatio-temporal expression patterns and evolutional conservation in Sus scrofa.
    Tang Z; Wu Y; Yang Y; Yang YT; Wang Z; Yuan J; Yang Y; Hua C; Fan X; Niu G; Zhang Y; Lu ZJ; Li K
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43166. PubMed ID: 28233874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of minipig, dog, monkey and human drug metabolism and disposition.
    Dalgaard L
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 74():80-92. PubMed ID: 25545337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The genomic organization and expression pattern of the low-affinity Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) in the Göttingen minipig.
    Egli J; Schmucki R; Loos B; Reichl S; Grabole N; Roller A; Ebeling M; Odermatt A; Iglesias A
    Immunogenetics; 2019 Feb; 71(2):123-136. PubMed ID: 30564855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint Profiling of miRNAs and mRNAs Reveals miRNA Mediated Gene Regulation in the Göttingen Minipig Obesity Model.
    Mentzel CM; Alkan F; Keinicke H; Jacobsen MJ; Gorodkin J; Fredholm M; Cirera S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167285. PubMed ID: 27902747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of swine leukocyte antigen gene diversity in Göttingen Minipigs.
    Hammer SE; Duckova T; Gociman M; Groiss S; Pernold CPS; Hacker K; Kasper L; Sprung J; Stadler M; Jensen AE; Saalmüller A; Wenzel N; Figueiredo C
    Front Immunol; 2024; 15():1360022. PubMed ID: 38469309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic management of the Göttingen Minipig population.
    Simianer H; Köhn F
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2010; 62(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 20570747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beta-cell function and mass in type 2 diabetes.
    Larsen MO
    Dan Med Bull; 2009 Aug; 56(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 19728971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The minipig in toxicology.
    Svendsen O
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2006 Jul; 57(5-6):335-9. PubMed ID: 16725317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the Tissue Composition-Based Model to Minipig for Predicting the Volume of Distribution at Steady State and Dermis-to-Plasma Partition Coefficients of Drugs Used in the Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics Model in Dermatology.
    Poulin P; Collet SH; Atrux-Tallau N; Linget JM; Hennequin L; Wilson CE
    J Pharm Sci; 2019 Jan; 108(1):603-619. PubMed ID: 30222978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.