These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26573887)

  • 41. Pay for performance schemes in primary care: what have we learnt?
    Peckham S; Wallace A
    Qual Prim Care; 2010; 18(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 20529472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pay for performance in health care: an international overview of initiatives.
    Eijkenaar F
    Med Care Res Rev; 2012 Jun; 69(3):251-76. PubMed ID: 22311954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Using Patient-Reported Information to Improve Clinical Practice.
    Schlesinger M; Grob R; Shaller D
    Health Serv Res; 2015 Dec; 50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):2116-54. PubMed ID: 26573890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Incentive schemes to increase dementia diagnoses in primary care in England: a retrospective cohort study of unintended consequences.
    Liu D; Green E; Kasteridis P; Goddard M; Jacobs R; Wittenberg R; Mason A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Mar; 69(680):e154-e163. PubMed ID: 30803980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How payment systems affect physicians' provision behaviour--an experimental investigation.
    Hennig-Schmidt H; Selten R; Wiesen D
    J Health Econ; 2011 Jul; 30(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 21683460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Physicians' and nurses' attitudes towards performance-based financial incentives in Burundi: a qualitative study in the province of Gitega.
    Rudasingwa M; Uwizeye MR
    Glob Health Action; 2017; 10(1):1270813. PubMed ID: 28452651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Changing physician incentives for affordable, quality cancer care: results of an episode payment model.
    Newcomer LN; Gould B; Page RD; Donelan SA; Perkins M
    J Oncol Pract; 2014 Sep; 10(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 25006221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Implementation Processes and Pay for Performance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.
    Kondo KK; Damberg CL; Mendelson A; Motu'apuaka M; Freeman M; O'Neil M; Relevo R; Low A; Kansagara D
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 26951276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pay for performance for specialised care in England: Strengths and weaknesses.
    Feng Y; Kristensen SR; Lorgelly P; Meacock R; Sanchez MR; Siciliani L; Sutton M
    Health Policy; 2019 Nov; 123(11):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 31405615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluating a Pay-for-Performance Program for Medicaid Children in an Accountable Care Organization.
    Gleeson S; Kelleher K; Gardner W
    JAMA Pediatr; 2016 Mar; 170(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 26810378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Michigan's fee-for-value physician incentive program reduces spending and improves quality in primary care.
    Lemak CH; Nahra TA; Cohen GR; Erb ND; Paustian ML; Share D; Hirth RA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2015 Apr; 34(4):645-52. PubMed ID: 25847648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Improving health systems performance in low- and middle-income countries: a system dynamics model of the pay-for-performance initiative in Afghanistan.
    Alonge O; Lin S; Igusa T; Peters DH
    Health Policy Plan; 2017 Dec; 32(10):1417-1426. PubMed ID: 29029075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quality-based payment for medical groups and individual physicians.
    Robinson JC; Shortell SM; Rittenhouse DR; Fernandes-Taylor S; Gillies RR; Casalino LP
    Inquiry; 2009; 46(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 19694390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Incentive implementation in physician practices: A qualitative study of practice executive perspectives on pay for performance.
    Bokhour BG; Burgess JF; Hook JM; White B; Berlowitz D; Guldin MR; Meterko M; Young GJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Feb; 63(1 Suppl):73S-95S. PubMed ID: 16688925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pay for performance (P4P).
    Leitman M; Adusumilli PS
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 18472703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of a PPO pay-for-performance program on patients with diabetes.
    Chen JY; Tian H; Taira Juarez D; Hodges KA; Brand JC; Chung RS; Legorreta AP
    Am J Manag Care; 2010 Jan; 16(1):e11-9. PubMed ID: 20059287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Doing More for More: Unintended Consequences of Financial Incentives for Oncology Specialty Care.
    O'Neil B; Graves AJ; Barocas DA; Chang SS; Penson DF; Resnick MJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Feb; 108(2):. PubMed ID: 26582063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Measuring the effects of managed care on physicians' perceptions of their personal financial incentives.
    Mitchell JM; Hadley J; Sulmasy DP; Bloche JG
    Inquiry; 2000; 37(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 10985108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pharmacy management approach: how do we align all the incentives?
    Dunn JD
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2007 Mar; 13(2 Suppl B):S16-9. PubMed ID: 17341142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sustainability of quality improvement following removal of pay-for-performance incentives.
    Benzer JK; Young GJ; Burgess JF; Baker E; Mohr DC; Charns MP; Kaboli PJ
    J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Jan; 29(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 23929219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.