These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26574197)

  • 1. Accuracy of current all-atom force-fields in modeling protein disordered states.
    Palazzesi F; Prakash MK; Bonomi M; Barducci A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jan; 11(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 26574197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
    Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Coupled Two-Dimensional Main Chain Torsional Potential in Modeling Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Gao Y; Zhang C; Zhang JZ; Mei Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 28095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conformational Dynamics of Two Natively Unfolded Fragment Peptides: Comparison of the AMBER and CHARMM Force Fields.
    Chen W; Shi C; MacKerell AD; Shen J
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(25):7902-10. PubMed ID: 26020564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
    Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The combined force field-sampling problem in simulations of disordered amyloid-β peptides.
    Lincoff J; Sasmal S; Head-Gordon T
    J Chem Phys; 2019 Mar; 150(10):104108. PubMed ID: 30876367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generating Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles from a Database of Ramachandran Space Pair Residue Probabilities Using a Markov Chain.
    Cukier RI
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Oct; 122(39):9087-9101. PubMed ID: 30204435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of electrostatic interactions in binding of peptides and intrinsically disordered proteins to their folded targets. 1. NMR and MD characterization of the complex between the c-Crk N-SH3 domain and the peptide Sos.
    Xue Y; Yuwen T; Zhu F; Skrynnikov NR
    Biochemistry; 2014 Oct; 53(41):6473-95. PubMed ID: 25207671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting NMR relaxation of proteins from molecular dynamics simulations with accurate methyl rotation barriers.
    Hoffmann F; Mulder FAA; Schäfer LV
    J Chem Phys; 2020 Feb; 152(8):084102. PubMed ID: 32113361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ensemble fits of restrained peptides' conformational equilibria to NMR data. Dependence on force fields: AMBER/8 ff03 versus ECEPP/3.
    Ciarkowski J; Łuczak S; Jagieła D; Sikorska E; Wójcik J; Oleszczuk M; Izdebski J
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Feb; 32():67-74. PubMed ID: 22079210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA.
    Galindo-Murillo R; Robertson JC; Zgarbová M; Šponer J; Otyepka M; Jurečka P; Cheatham TE
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Aug; 12(8):4114-27. PubMed ID: 27300587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic Differences between Current Molecular Dynamics Force Fields To Represent Local Properties of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Yu L; Li DW; Brüschweiler R
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(3):798-804. PubMed ID: 33444020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of torsion angle molecular dynamics for efficient sampling of protein conformations.
    Chen J; Im W; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Nov; 26(15):1565-78. PubMed ID: 16145655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrinsically disordered protein-specific force field CHARMM36IDPSFF.
    Liu H; Song D; Lu H; Luo R; Chen HF
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2018 Oct; 92(4):1722-1735. PubMed ID: 29808548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refining All-Atom Protein Force Fields for Polar-Rich, Prion-like, Low-Complexity Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
    Tang WS; Fawzi NL; Mittal J
    J Phys Chem B; 2020 Oct; 124(43):9505-9512. PubMed ID: 33078950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterns in Protein Flexibility: A Comparison of NMR "Ensembles", MD Trajectories, and Crystallographic B-Factors.
    Reinknecht C; Riga A; Rivera J; Snyder DA
    Molecules; 2021 Mar; 26(5):. PubMed ID: 33803249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validating Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Experimental Observables in Light of Underlying Conformational Ensembles.
    Childers MC; Daggett V
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Jul; 122(26):6673-6689. PubMed ID: 29864281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: On the Accuracy of the TIP4P-D Water Model and the Representativeness of Protein Disorder Models.
    Henriques J; Skepö M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jul; 12(7):3407-15. PubMed ID: 27243806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of force fields and sampling methods in simulating pepX peptides: a case study for intrinsically disordered proteins.
    Wang A; Peng X; Li Y; Zhang D; Zhang Z; Li G
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Jan; 23(3):2430-2437. PubMed ID: 33459730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conformational Preferences of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein Domain: A Case Study for Modern Force Fields.
    Gopal SM; Wingbermühle S; Schnatwinkel J; Juber S; Herrmann C; Schäfer LV
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 Jan; 125(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 33382616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.