These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Part 2: Readers respond to "Science and sensibility: an interview with professor Rolf M. Zinkernagel, Nobel Prize winner for medicine 1996". Dhamangaonkar AC; Kulkarni UP Medscape J Med; 2008 Mar; 10(3):76. PubMed ID: 18449373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Discovery, theory change, and the Nobel Prize: on the mechanisms of scientific evolution. An introduction. Lindahl BI Theor Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 1412077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the Nobel Prize good for science? Casadevall A; Fang FC FASEB J; 2013 Dec; 27(12):4682-90. PubMed ID: 24008752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Readers' and authors' responses to "Science and sensibility: an interview with professor Rolf M. Zinkernagel, Nobel Prize winner for medicine 1996". Dhamangaonkar AC; Kulkarni UP Medscape J Med; 2008 Feb; 10(2):39; discussion 39. PubMed ID: 18382708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nobel laureate's death highlights struggles at Egyptian science hub. Amer P; Yahia M Nature; 2016 Aug; 536(7616):260. PubMed ID: 27535515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Japanese Nobels fail to inspire interest in science. Cyranoski D Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):787. PubMed ID: 15103340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science and sensibility: an interview with Professor Rolf M. Zinkernagel, Nobel Prize Winner for Medicine 1996. Interview by Hrishikesh Satish Kulkarni and Ajit H. Goenka. Zinkernagel RM MedGenMed; 2007 Nov; 9(4):28. PubMed ID: 18311378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Timeline: Lindau and the zeitgeist. Simmons JG Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S14-5. PubMed ID: 20944614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Welcoming remarks about the Janus phenomenon in science. Esaki L Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 1997 May; 43(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 9193779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Studies on the structure of double helix DNA in the last half century: Changes in the nature of scientific research]. Murakami Y Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso; 2003 May; 48(6):698-9. PubMed ID: 12816002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What to do after winning the Nobel Prize--work harder! Smyth JF Eur J Cancer; 2009 Feb; 45(3):318. PubMed ID: 19121934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Solve the Nobel Prize dilemma. Now that teams, not individuals, drive high-impact science, the Nobel Foundation should change how it awards its prize. Sci Am; 2012 Oct; 307(4):12. PubMed ID: 23029876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. From Los Alamos to Stockholm. Interview by Andreas Trabesinger. Glauber R Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):S13. PubMed ID: 23051767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Behavioral science and the Nobel Prize: a history. Benjamin LT Am Psychol; 2003 Sep; 58(9):731-41. PubMed ID: 14584990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The scientific work of Professor OCHOA; 1959 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine]. SANTOS RUIZ A An Real Acad Farm; 1960 Sep; 26():191-202. PubMed ID: 13746395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Finding fascination in nature. Interview by Dan Csontos. Osheroff D Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):S8-9. PubMed ID: 23051771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Death of the Heart Failure Clinical Investigator: Molecules and Receptors Win Nobel Prizes, Clinical Investigation Improves Survival. O'Connor CM JACC Heart Fail; 2016 Feb; 4(2):162-163. PubMed ID: 26823118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]