BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26575391)

  • 1. The 'Dispersal Rate' - a product dependent characteristic to predict the reliability of the calibrated in vitro SPF on WW5 plates.
    Batzer J; Bleckmann A; Lerg H; Schwanke F; Schläger T
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Jun; 38(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 26575391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a new in vitro Sun Protection Factor method to include a wide range of sunscreen product emulsion types.
    Pissavini M; Tricaud C; Wiener G; Lauer A; Contier M; Kolbe L; Trullás Cabanas C; Boyer F; Meredith E; de Lapuente J; Dietrich E; Matts PJ
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2020 Oct; 42(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 32390187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New noninvasive approach assessing in vivo sun protection factor (SPF) using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and in vitro transmission.
    Ruvolo Junior E; Kollias N; Cole C
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2014 Aug; 30(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 24417335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting SPF in vitro measurement and correlation with in vivo results.
    Dimitrovska Cvetkovska A; Manfredini S; Ziosi P; Molesini S; Dissette V; Magri I; Scapoli C; Carrieri A; Durini E; Vertuani S
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2017 Jun; 39(3):310-319. PubMed ID: 27782308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new chemical approach to optimize the in vitro SPF method on the HD6 PMMA plate.
    Marguerie S; Pissavini M; Baud A; Carayol T; Doucet O
    J Cosmet Sci; 2012; 63(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 23193888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New approach for a reliable in vitro sun protection factor method - Part II: Practical aspects and implementations.
    Miksa S; Lutz D; Guy C; Delamour E
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Oct; 38(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 27060786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of sun protection factors by calculation of transmissions with a calibrated step film model.
    Herzog B
    J Cosmet Sci; 2002; 53(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 11917252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of sun protection factors of sunscreen agents using a novel UV spectrophotometric technique.
    Bleasel MD; Aldous S
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):259-70. PubMed ID: 18713072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of sunscreen products spreading protocol and substrate roughness for in vitro sun protection factor assessment.
    Fageon L; Moyal D; Coutet J; Candau D
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2009 Dec; 31(6):405-18. PubMed ID: 19627381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SPF and UVA-PF sunscreen evaluation: are there good correlations among results obtained in vivo, in vitro and in a theoretical Sunscreen Simulator? A real-life exercise.
    Santos Caetano JP; Abarca AP; Guerato M; Guerra L; Schalka S; Perez Simão DC; Vila R
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Dec; 38(6):576-580. PubMed ID: 27012956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of different substrate materials for in vitro sunscreen tests.
    Garoli D; Pelizzo MG; Nicolosi P; Peserico A; Tonin E; Alaibac M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2009 Nov; 56(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 19700264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sunscreen sun protection factor claim based on in vivo interlaboratory variability.
    Miksa S; Lutz D; Guy C; Delamour E
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2016 Dec; 38(6):541-549. PubMed ID: 27079525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New approach for a reliable in vitro sun protection factor method Part I: Principle and mathematical aspects.
    Miksa S; Lutz D; Guy C
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2015 Dec; 37(6):555-66. PubMed ID: 25854750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of different substrates for the in vitro determination of sunscreen photostability: spectrophotometric and HPLC analyses.
    Scalia S; Mezzena M; Bianchi A
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2010 Feb; 32(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 19732185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Porcine ear skin as a biological substrate for in vitro testing of sunscreen performance.
    Sohn M; Korn V; Imanidis G
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2015; 28(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 25096635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consequences for sun protection factors when solar simulator spectra deviate from the spectrum of the sun.
    Uhlmann B; Mann T; Gers-Barlag H; Alert D; Sauermann G
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 1996 Feb; 18(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 19245475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How a calculated model of sunscreen film geometry can explain in vitro and in vivo SPF variation.
    Ferrero L; Pissavini M; Doucet O
    Photochem Photobiol Sci; 2010 Apr; 9(4):540-51. PubMed ID: 20354649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sunscreen tests: correspondence between in vitro data and values reported by the manufacturers.
    Garoli D; Pelizzo MG; Bernardini B; Nicolosi P; Alaibac M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2008 Dec; 52(3):193-204. PubMed ID: 18755574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative evaluation method in vitro for the water-resistant effect of sunscreen products.
    Ahn S; Yang H; Lee H; Moon S; Chang I
    Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 18412561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of sun protection factors determined by an in vivo and different in vitro methodologies: a study with 58 different commercially available sunscreen products.
    Heinrich U; Tronnier H; Kockott D; Kuckuk R; Heise HM
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2004 Apr; 26(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18494916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.