180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26575523)
1. Uterine electromyography during active phase compared with latent phase of labor at term.
Trojner Bregar A; Lucovnik M; Verdenik I; Jager F; Gersak K; Garfield RE
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Feb; 95(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 26575523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery.
Maul H; Maner WL; Olson G; Saade GR; Garfield RE
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 15280119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of obesity on preterm delivery prediction by transabdominal recording of uterine electromyography.
Lucovnik M; Chambliss LR; Blumrick R; Balducci J; Gersak K; Garfield RE
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 55(5):692-696. PubMed ID: 27751417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.
Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery.
Lucovnik M; Maner WL; Chambliss LR; Blumrick R; Balducci J; Novak-Antolic Z; Garfield RE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 204(3):228.e1-10. PubMed ID: 21145033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry.
Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; Busowski JD; Euliano N; Gregg AR
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 26960704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography.
Hassan M; Terrien J; Muszynski C; Alexandersson A; Marque C; Karlsson B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 60(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 23192483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uterine electromyography for identification of first-stage labor arrest in term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor.
Vasak B; Graatsma EM; Hekman-Drost E; Eijkemans MJ; van Leeuwen JH; Visser GH; Jacod BC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 209(3):232.e1-8. PubMed ID: 23727524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous Recording and Analysis of Uterine and Abdominal Muscle Electromyographic Activity in Nulliparous Women During Labor.
Qian X; Li P; Shi SQ; Garfield RE; Liu H
Reprod Sci; 2017 Mar; 24(3):471-477. PubMed ID: 27436367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between electrical uterine monitor, tocodynamometer and intra uterine pressure catheter for uterine activity in labor.
Hadar E; Biron-Shental T; Gavish O; Raban O; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1367-74. PubMed ID: 25123517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting uterine electrical activity during the active phase of labor prior to rupture of membranes.
Hiersch L; Salzer L; Aviram A; Ben-Haroush A; Ashwal E; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015; 28(14):1633-6. PubMed ID: 25212973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The association between myometrial electrical activity and time to delivery in threatened preterm labor.
Aviram A; Hiersch L; Ashwal E; Yogev Y; Hadar E
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Sep; 29(18):2897-903. PubMed ID: 26493342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of Uterine and Abdominal Muscle Electromyography in Pregnant Women for Estimation of Expulsive Activities during the 2nd Stage of Labor.
Qian X; Li P; Shi S; Garfield RE; Liu H
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):555-561. PubMed ID: 31039575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Electrohysterography. A promising alternative for monitoring contractions].
Vlemminx MW; de Lau H; Vullings R; Peters CH; Oei SG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8535. PubMed ID: 25650036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active contractions of the cervix in the latent phase of labour.
Rudel D; Pajntar M
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 May; 106(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 10430195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of wavelet transform to uterine electromyographic signals recorded using abdominal surface electrodes.
Eswaran H; Wilson JD; Murphy P; Preissl H; Lowery CL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Mar; 11(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 12380670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Towards improving uterine electrical activity modeling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor.
de Lau H; Rabotti C; Haazen N; Oei SG; Mischi M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 24117329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electromyographic activity in cervices with very low Bishop score during labor.
Pajntar M; Verdenik I
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Jun; 49(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 9764866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
