These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

678 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26575851)

  • 1. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
    Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
    Herling SF
    Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
    Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
    Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer.
    Herling SF; Møller AM; Palle C; Grynnerup A; Thomsen T
    Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A retrospective evaluation of the perioperative drug use and comparison of its cost in robotic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.
    Agarwal R; Rajanbabu A; Unnikrishnan UG
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):665-672. PubMed ID: 29569172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post robotic investment: Cost consequences and impact on length of stay for obese women with endometrial cancer.
    Korsholm M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Mogensen O; Möller S; Joergensen SL; Jensen PT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Oct; 100(10):1830-1839. PubMed ID: 34322867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates.
    Chan JK; Gardner AB; Taylor K; Thompson CA; Blansit K; Yu X; Kapp DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 26363212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy seems safe in women with early-stage endometrial cancer.
    Herling SF; Havemann MC; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T
    Dan Med J; 2015 Aug; 62(8):A5109. PubMed ID: 26239585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
    Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
    Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Dandolu V; Pathak P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.