670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26575851)
1. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
Herling SF
Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer.
Herling SF; Møller AM; Palle C; Grynnerup A; Thomsen T
Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective evaluation of the perioperative drug use and comparison of its cost in robotic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Agarwal R; Rajanbabu A; Unnikrishnan UG
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):665-672. PubMed ID: 29569172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post robotic investment: Cost consequences and impact on length of stay for obese women with endometrial cancer.
Korsholm M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Mogensen O; Möller S; Joergensen SL; Jensen PT
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Oct; 100(10):1830-1839. PubMed ID: 34322867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates.
Chan JK; Gardner AB; Taylor K; Thompson CA; Blansit K; Yu X; Kapp DS
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Nov; 139(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 26363212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy seems safe in women with early-stage endometrial cancer.
Herling SF; Havemann MC; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T
Dan Med J; 2015 Aug; 62(8):A5109. PubMed ID: 26239585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Dandolu V; Pathak P
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
