BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26575935)

  • 1. Protein-Ligand Electrostatic Binding Free Energies from Explicit and Implicit Solvation.
    Izadi S; Aguilar B; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Sep; 11(9):4450-9. PubMed ID: 26575935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy comparison of several common implicit solvent models and their implementations in the context of protein-ligand binding.
    Katkova EV; Onufriev AV; Aguilar B; Sulimov VB
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Mar; 72():70-80. PubMed ID: 28064081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation.
    Roe DR; Okur A; Wickstrom L; Hornak V; Simmerling C
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Feb; 111(7):1846-57. PubMed ID: 17256983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidimensional Global Optimization and Robustness Analysis in the Context of Protein-Ligand Binding.
    Forouzesh N; Mukhopadhyay A; Watson LT; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Jul; 16(7):4669-4684. PubMed ID: 32450041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grid-Based Surface Generalized Born Model for Calculation of Electrostatic Binding Free Energies.
    Forouzesh N; Izadi S; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Oct; 57(10):2505-2513. PubMed ID: 28786669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Connecting free energy surfaces in implicit and explicit solvent: an efficient method to compute conformational and solvation free energies.
    Deng N; Zhang BW; Levy RM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2868-78. PubMed ID: 26236174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy Comparison of Generalized Born Models in the Calculation of Electrostatic Binding Free Energies.
    Izadi S; Harris RC; Fenley MO; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Mar; 14(3):1656-1670. PubMed ID: 29378399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized Born and Explicit Solvent Models for Free Energy Calculations in Organic Solvents: Cyclodextrin Dimerization.
    Zhang H; Tan T; van der Spoel D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Nov; 11(11):5103-13. PubMed ID: 26574308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimized parameters for continuum solvation calculations with carbohydrates.
    Green DF
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Apr; 112(16):5238-49. PubMed ID: 18386862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explicit Solvent Hydration Benchmark for Proteins with Application to the PBSA Method.
    Setny P; Dudek A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jun; 13(6):2762-2776. PubMed ID: 28498675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calculating the binding free energies of charged species based on explicit-solvent simulations employing lattice-sum methods: an accurate correction scheme for electrostatic finite-size effects.
    Rocklin GJ; Mobley DL; Dill KA; Hünenberger PH
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Nov; 139(18):184103. PubMed ID: 24320250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient Computation of the Total Solvation Energy of Small Molecules via the R6 Generalized Born Model.
    Aguilar B; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2012 Jul; 8(7):2404-11. PubMed ID: 26588972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combining the polarizable Drude force field with a continuum electrostatic Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvation model.
    Aleksandrov A; Lin FY; Roux B; MacKerell AD
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Aug; 39(22):1707-1719. PubMed ID: 29737546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of ligand-binding affinities supported by quantum mechanical methods.
    Söderhjelm P; Kongsted J; Genheden S; Ryde U
    Interdiscip Sci; 2010 Mar; 2(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 20640794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why Computed Protein Folding Landscapes Are Sensitive to the Water Model.
    Anandakrishnan R; Izadi S; Onufriev AV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jan; 15(1):625-636. PubMed ID: 30514080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the dynamics and electrostatic interactions of folded proteins in implicit solvents.
    Hua DP; Huang H; Roy A; Post CB
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 26189497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new set of atomic radii for accurate estimation of solvation free energy by Poisson-Boltzmann solvent model.
    Yamagishi J; Okimoto N; Morimoto G; Taiji M
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Nov; 35(29):2132-9. PubMed ID: 25220475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new implicit solvent model for protein-ligand docking.
    Morreale A; Gil-Redondo R; Ortiz AR
    Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):606-16. PubMed ID: 17330937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.
    Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Gilson MK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 27638809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.
    Genheden S; Mikulskis P; Hu L; Kongsted J; Söderhjelm P; Ryde U
    J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):13081-92. PubMed ID: 21728337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.