374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26576553)
1. Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?
Choung BS; Kim SH; Yoo KB; Seo SY; Kim IH; Lee SO; Lee ST; Kim SW
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 26576553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit.
Benson ME; Reichelderfer M; Said A; Gaumnitz EA; Pfau PR
Dig Dis Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 19156519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy in the Peruvian Japanese Policlinic: linked factors].
Pérez VP; Yamamoto JW; Nago AN; Benavides MA; Ulloa CR; Alvarez GV; Calixto NN; Yoshidaira MY; Sánchez TG; Sánchez JP
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2011 Dec; 41(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 22292224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what?
Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 101(4):732-4. PubMed ID: 16635220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program.
Lee TJ; Rees CJ; Blanks RG; Moss SM; Nickerson C; Wright KC; James PW; McNally RJ; Patnick J; Rutter MD
Endoscopy; 2014 Mar; 46(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 24473907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring colonoscopy withdrawal time significantly improves the adenoma detection rate and the performance of endoscopists.
Vavricka SR; Sulz MC; Degen L; Rechner R; Manz M; Biedermann L; Beglinger C; Peter S; Safroneeva E; Rogler G; Schoepfer AM
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 26808396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Lee TJ; Rutter MD; Blanks RG; Moss SM; Goddard AF; Chilton A; Nickerson C; McNally RJ; Patnick J; Rees CJ
Gut; 2012 Jul; 61(7):1050-7. PubMed ID: 21940723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Njor SH; Laurberg S; Valori R; Andersen B
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 54(9):1176-1181. PubMed ID: 31498716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria.
Waldmann E; Gessl I; Sallinger D; Jeschek P; Britto-Arias M; Heinze G; Fasching E; Weiss W; Gschwantler M; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2016 Dec; 48(12):1102-1109. PubMed ID: 27576182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection.
von Renteln D; Robertson DJ; Bensen S; Pohl H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):574-580. PubMed ID: 27590962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective cohort study evaluating a novel colonoscopy platform featuring full-spectrum endoscopy.
Gralnek IM; Segol O; Suissa A; Siersema PD; Carr-Locke DL; Halpern Z; Santo E; Domanov S
Endoscopy; 2013 Sep; 45(9):697-702. PubMed ID: 23939509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
