311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26576572)
1. How do the trends in the prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy change after a non-invasive prenatal test becomes available? A Japanese single center study.
Hasegawa J; Nakamura M; Sekizawa A
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2015 Apr; 42(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 26576572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing at a large academic referral center.
Larion S; Warsof SL; Romary L; Mlynarczyk M; Peleg D; Abuhamad AZ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):651.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24954652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive prenatal testing: impact on genetic counseling, invasive prenatal diagnosis, and trisomy 21 detection.
Wax JR; Cartin A; Chard R; Lucas FL; Pinette MG
J Clin Ultrasound; 2015 Jan; 43(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25303161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uptake of fetal aneuploidy screening after the introduction of the non-invasive prenatal test: A national population-based register study.
van der Meij KRM; de Groot-van Mooren M; Carbo EWS; Pieters MJ; Rodenburg W; Sistermans EA; Cornel MC; Henneman L;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jul; 100(7):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 33465829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of expanded noninvasive prenatal test in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.
Xie X; Zhou H; Zhao Q; Lu Y; Meng Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6213-6218. PubMed ID: 34649482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive prenatal testing: more caution in counseling is needed in high risk pregnancies with ultrasound abnormalities.
Oneda B; Steindl K; Masood R; Reshetnikova I; Krejci P; Baldinger R; Reissmann R; Taralczak M; Guetg A; Wisser J; Fauchère JC; Rauch A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():72-5. PubMed ID: 26989803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Beulen L; Grutters JP; Faas BH; Feenstra I; van Vugt JM; Bekker MN
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():53-61. PubMed ID: 25238658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing as a first-tier aneuploidy screening test: A survey among Dutch midwives about their role as counsellors.
Martin L; Gitsels-van der Wal JT; de Boer MA; Vanstone M; Henneman L
Midwifery; 2018 Jan; 56():1-8. PubMed ID: 29024868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's choices for invasive or non-invasive testing: influence of gestational age and service delivery.
Chen A; Tenhunen H; Torkki P; Heinonen S; Lillrank P; Stefanovic V
Prenat Diagn; 2016 Dec; 36(13):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 27859455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex chromosome aneuploidy detection by noninvasive prenatal testing: helpful or hazardous?
Reiss RE; Discenza M; Foster J; Dobson L; Wilkins-Haug L
Prenat Diagn; 2017 May; 37(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 28326560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is nuchal translucency screening associated with different rates of invasive testing in an older obstetric population?
Chasen ST; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 15042012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive prenatal testing: impact on invasive prenatal diagnosis at a mainland Chinese tertiary medical center.
Li DZ; Zhen L; Pan M; Han J; Yang X; Ou YM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(21):3539-41. PubMed ID: 26743024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women following positive aneuploidy screening.
Chetty S; Garabedian MJ; Norton ME
Prenat Diagn; 2013 Jun; 33(6):542-6. PubMed ID: 23592525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in the general pregnancy population: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Fairbrother G; Burigo J; Sharon T; Song K
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(7):1160-4. PubMed ID: 26000626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From Down syndrome screening to noninvasive prenatal testing: 20 years' experience in Taiwan.
Shaw SW; Chen CP; Cheng PJ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Dec; 52(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 24411028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Economic Analysis of Cell-Free DNA Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the US General Pregnancy Population.
Benn P; Curnow KJ; Chapman S; Michalopoulos SN; Hornberger J; Rabinowitz M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132313. PubMed ID: 26158465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective observations study protocol to investigate cost-effectiveness of various prenatal test strategies after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing.
Kim SY; Lee SM; Jun JK; Han YJ; Kim MH; Shim JY; Lee MY; Oh SY; Lee J; Kim SH; Cha DH; Cho GJ; Kwon HS; Kim BJ; Park MH; Cho HY; Ko HS; Ahn J; Ryu HM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jul; 18(1):307. PubMed ID: 30041617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomy in a mixed risk factors pregnancy population.
Li WH; Wang PH; Chuang CM; Chang YW; Yang MJ; Chen CY; Chao KC; Yen MS
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 54(2):122-5. PubMed ID: 25951714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attitude changes toward prenatal testing among women with twin pregnancies after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: A single-center study in Japan.
Ogawa M; Hasuo Y; Taura Y; Tsunematsu R; Shikada S; Matsushita Y; Sato K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Nov; 47(11):3813-3820. PubMed ID: 34490692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
