162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26576613)
1. Evaluation of data discretization methods to derive platform independent isoform expression signatures for multi-class tumor subtyping.
Jung S; Bi Y; Davuluri RV
BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S3. PubMed ID: 26576613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Platform-Independent Classification System to Predict Molecular Subtypes of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.
Shilpi A; Kandpal M; Ji Y; Seagle BL; Shahabi S; Davuluri RV
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 Apr; 3():1-9. PubMed ID: 31002564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Isoform-level gene signature improves prognostic stratification and accurately classifies glioblastoma subtypes.
Pal S; Bi Y; Macyszyn L; Showe LC; O'Rourke DM; Davuluri RV
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Apr; 42(8):e64. PubMed ID: 24503249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of isoform-level gene expression estimation algorithms for RNA-seq and exon-array platforms.
Dapas M; Kandpal M; Bi Y; Davuluri RV
Brief Bioinform; 2017 Mar; 18(2):260-269. PubMed ID: 26944083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the use of QDE-SVM for gene feature selection and cell type classification from scRNA-seq data.
Ng GYL; Tan SC; Ong CS
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292961. PubMed ID: 37856458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simplified integrated molecular and immunohistochemistry-based algorithm allows high accuracy prediction of glioblastoma transcriptional subtypes.
Orzan F; Pagani F; Cominelli M; Triggiani L; Calza S; De Bacco F; Medicina D; Balzarini P; Panciani PP; Liserre R; Buglione M; Fontanella MM; Medico E; Galli R; Isella C; Boccaccio C; Poliani PL;
Lab Invest; 2020 Oct; 100(10):1330-1344. PubMed ID: 32404931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer survival classification using integrated data sets and intermediate information.
Kim S; Park T; Kon M
Artif Intell Med; 2014 Sep; 62(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 24997860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identification of an Efficient Gene Expression Panel for Glioblastoma Classification.
Crisman TJ; Zelaya I; Laks DR; Zhao Y; Kawaguchi R; Gao F; Kornblum HI; Coppola G
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0164649. PubMed ID: 27855170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Platform-integrated mRNA isoform quantification.
Sun J; Chang JW; Zhang T; Yong J; Kuang R; Zhang W
Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2466-2473. PubMed ID: 31834359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-platform analysis of cancer microarray data improves gene expression based classification of phenotypes.
Warnat P; Eils R; Brors B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():265. PubMed ID: 16271137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A large-scale comparative study of isoform expressions measured on four platforms.
Zhang W; Petegrosso R; Chang JW; Sun J; Yong J; Chien J; Kuang R
BMC Genomics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):272. PubMed ID: 32228441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unsupervised deep learning reveals prognostically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma.
Young JD; Cai C; Lu X
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Oct; 18(Suppl 11):381. PubMed ID: 28984190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study of discretization methods of microarray data for inferring transcriptional regulatory networks.
Li Y; Liu L; Bai X; Cai H; Ji W; Guo D; Zhu Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11():520. PubMed ID: 20955620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of gene signatures from RNA-seq data using Pareto-optimal cluster algorithm.
Mallik S; Zhao Z
BMC Syst Biol; 2018 Dec; 12(Suppl 8):126. PubMed ID: 30577846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of different machine learning methods on microarray gene expression data.
Pirooznia M; Yang JY; Yang MQ; Deng Y
BMC Genomics; 2008; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S13. PubMed ID: 18366602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A consensus multi-view multi-objective gene selection approach for improved sample classification.
Acharya S; Cui L; Pan Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 13):386. PubMed ID: 32938388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of Attribute Driven Incremental Discretization and Logic Learning Machine to build a prognostic classifier for neuroblastoma patients.
Cangelosi D; Muselli M; Parodi S; Blengio F; Becherini P; Versteeg R; Conte M; Varesio L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 25078098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-class clustering of cancer subtypes through SVM based ensemble of pareto-optimal solutions for gene marker identification.
Mukhopadhyay A; Bandyopadhyay S; Maulik U
PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13803. PubMed ID: 21103052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving feature selection performance for classification of gene expression data using Harris Hawks optimizer with variable neighborhood learning.
Qu C; Zhang L; Li J; Deng F; Tang Y; Zeng X; Peng X
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33876181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
