These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26576696)
1. High volume improves outcomes: The argument for centralization of rectal cancer surgery. Aquina CT; Probst CP; Becerra AZ; Iannuzzi JC; Kelly KN; Hensley BJ; Rickles AS; Noyes K; Fleming FJ; Monson JR Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):736-48. PubMed ID: 26576696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The pitfalls of inguinal herniorrhaphy: Surgeon volume matters. Aquina CT; Probst CP; Kelly KN; Iannuzzi JC; Noyes K; Fleming FJ; Monson JR Surgery; 2015 Sep; 158(3):736-46. PubMed ID: 26036880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Who performs proctectomy for rectal cancer in the United States? Ricciardi R; Roberts PL; Read TE; Baxter NN; Marcello PW; Schoetz DJ Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Oct; 54(10):1210-5. PubMed ID: 21904134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonelective colon cancer resection: A continued public health concern. Aquina CT; Becerra AZ; Xu Z; Boscoe FP; Schymura MJ; Noyes K; Monson JRT; Fleming FJ Surgery; 2017 Jun; 161(6):1609-1618. PubMed ID: 28237645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgeon Annual and Cumulative Volumes Predict Early Postoperative Outcomes after Rectal Cancer Resection. Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; O'Mahoney PR; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28009740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Regionalization of Lumbar Spine Procedures in New York State: A 10-Year Analysis. Jancuska J; Adrados M; Hutzler L; Bosco J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 26579962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of surgeon volume on colostomy reversal outcomes after Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis. Aquina CT; Probst CP; Becerra AZ; Hensley BJ; Iannuzzi JC; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ Surgery; 2016 Nov; 160(5):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 27395762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study. Dobbins TA; Young JM; Solomon MJ Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Apr; 57(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24608296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark. Iversen LH Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. State-wide outcomes in elective rectal cancer resection: is there a case for centralization in Victoria? Hong MK; Yeung JMC; Watters DAK; Faragher IG ANZ J Surg; 2019 Dec; 89(12):1642-1646. PubMed ID: 31802618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Wibe A; Syse A; Andersen E; Tretli S; Myrvold HE; Søreide O; Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Jan; 47(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14719151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Craniotomy for meningioma in the United States between 1988 and 2000: decreasing rate of mortality and the effect of provider caseload. Curry WT; McDermott MW; Carter BS; Barker FG J Neurosurg; 2005 Jun; 102(6):977-86. PubMed ID: 16028755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term outcomes for robotic colorectal surgery by provider volume. Keller DS; Hashemi L; Lu M; Delaney CP J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):1063-9.e1. PubMed ID: 24041555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the choice of hospital increase a chance of survival in rectal cancer? Pawlak M; Morawiec Z; Dziki Ł; Morawiec J; Kolacińska A; Dziki A Pol Przegl Chir; 2012 Dec; 84(12):638-45. PubMed ID: 23399631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Craniotomy for resection of pediatric brain tumors in the United States, 1988 to 2000: effects of provider caseloads and progressive centralization and specialization of care. Smith ER; Butler WE; Barker FG Neurosurgery; 2004 Mar; 54(3):553-63; discussion 563-5. PubMed ID: 15028128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of hospital volume on perioperative outcomes of rectal cancer. Jonker FHW; Hagemans JAW; Verhoef C; Burger JWA Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1894-1900. PubMed ID: 28822603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of surgeon and hospital caseload on the likelihood of performing laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: a study based on 55,949 patients. Weber WP; Guller U; Jain NB; Pietrobon R; Oertli D Arch Surg; 2007 Mar; 142(3):253-9; discussion 259. PubMed ID: 17372050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Influence of Hospital Volume on Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement: Results of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. Gietelink L; Henneman D; van Leersum NJ; de Noo M; Manusama E; Tanis PJ; Tollenaar RA; Wouters MW; Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):745-50. PubMed ID: 25790120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. No difference between lowest and highest volume hospitals in outcome after colorectal cancer surgery in the southern Netherlands. van Erning FN; van Steenbergen LN; van den Broek WT; Rutten HJ; Lemmens VE Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1199-206. PubMed ID: 24044806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer. Keller DS; Qiu J; Senagore AJ Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1556-1563. PubMed ID: 28917020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]