These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26577365)
1. Particle Image Velocimetry Used to Qualitatively Validate Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulations in an Oxygenator: A Proof of Concept. Schlanstein PC; Hesselmann F; Jansen SV; Gemsa J; Kaufmann TA; Klaas M; Roggenkamp D; Schröder W; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Arens J Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2015 Sep; 6(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 26577365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental Approach to Visualize Flow in a Stacked Hollow Fiber Bundle of an Artificial Lung With Particle Image Velocimetry. Kaesler A; Schlanstein PC; Hesselmann F; Büsen M; Klaas M; Roggenkamp D; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Arens J Artif Organs; 2017 Jun; 41(6):529-538. PubMed ID: 27925231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numerical modeling of anisotropic fiber bundle behavior in oxygenators. Bhavsar SS; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U Artif Organs; 2011 Nov; 35(11):1095-102. PubMed ID: 21973082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-Laboratory Characterization of the Velocity Field in the FDA Blood Pump Model Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). Hariharan P; Aycock KI; Buesen M; Day SW; Good BC; Herbertson LH; Steinseifer U; Manning KB; Craven BA; Malinauskas RA Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):623-640. PubMed ID: 30291585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of an axial flow blood pump: computational fluid dynamics results using particle image velocimetry. Su B; Chua LP; Wang X Artif Organs; 2012 Apr; 36(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 22040356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Steady Flow in a Patient-Averaged Inferior Vena Cava-Part II: Computational Fluid Dynamics Verification and Validation. Craven BA; Aycock KI; Manning KB Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):654-673. PubMed ID: 30446978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of the Human Pulmonary Arteries with Experimental Validation. Bordones AD; Leroux M; Kheyfets VO; Wu YA; Chen CY; Finol EA Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 29786774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD. Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numerical simulation of bubble induced shear in membrane bioreactors: effects of mixed liquor rheology and membrane configuration. Liu X; Wang Y; Waite TD; Leslie G Water Res; 2015 May; 75():131-45. PubMed ID: 25768986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computational fluid dynamics with stents: quantitative comparison with particle image velocimetry for three commercial off the shelf intracranial stents. Bouillot P; Brina O; Ouared R; Yilmaz H; Lovblad KO; Farhat M; Mendes Pereira V J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Mar; 8(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25603807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. Hariharan P; Giarra M; Reddy V; Day SW; Manning KB; Deutsch S; Stewart SF; Myers MR; Berman MR; Burgreen GW; Paterson EG; Malinauskas RA J Biomech Eng; 2011 Apr; 133(4):041002. PubMed ID: 21428676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biplane angiography for experimental validation of computational fluid dynamic models of blood flow in artificial lungs. Jones CC; Capasso P; McDonough JM; Wang D; Rosenstein KS; Zwischenberger JB ASAIO J; 2013; 59(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 23820279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ultrasound vector flow imaging and CFD simulations with PIV measurements of flow in a left ventricular outflow trackt phantom - Implications for clinical use and in silico studies. Leinan PR; Grønli T; Skjetne P; Wigen MS; Urheim S; Lovstakken L; Dahl SK Comput Biol Med; 2022 Jul; 146():105358. PubMed ID: 35751181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Particle Image Velocimetry Models of Distal-End Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Anastomoses for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Pulsatile Flow. Shintani Y; Iino K; Yamamoto Y; Kato H; Takemura H; Kiwata T Circ J; 2017 Dec; 82(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 28824030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How Computational Modeling can Help to Predict Gas Transfer in Artificial Lungs Early in the Design Process. Kaesler A; Rosen M; Schlanstein PC; Wagner G; Groß-Hardt S; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Arens J ASAIO J; 2020 Jun; 66(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 31789656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a numerical pump testing framework. Kaufmann TA; Gregory SD; Büsen MR; Tansley GD; Steinseifer U Artif Organs; 2014 Sep; 38(9):783-90. PubMed ID: 25234761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot validation of CFD model results against PIV observations of haemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents. Li Y; Verrelli DI; Yang W; Qian Y; Chong W J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109590. PubMed ID: 31902608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI. Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved computational fluid dynamic simulations of blood flow in membrane oxygenators from X-ray imaging. Jones CC; McDonough JM; Capasso P; Wang D; Rosenstein KS; Zwischenberger JB Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 41(10):2088-98. PubMed ID: 23673653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]